SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Ker) 470

V.GIRI
K. K. Sasidharan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:For the Petitioner:N. Sugathan, Advocate. For the Respondents: Government Pleader.

Judgment :

A question involving the relevant date that has to be taken, in assessing the eligibility of a person aspiring for promotion to the selection post, in the context of Note to Rule 28(b)(i)(7) of part II of KS and SSR (hereinafter Rules) and in the context of a possible vigilance case against the aspirants for promotion arises for consideration in this case. A detailed discussion has been undertaken in this case in circumstances where a distinction was sought to be drawn between criminal cases where FIR is registered against the Government servant involving offences under the Penal Code before the Courts of General Criminal jurisdiction and cases under the provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act taken cognizance of by a Vigilance Court.

2. I heard in detail learned counsel for the petitioner Sri. N.Sugathan and the senior Government Pleader Mr. P. Nandakumar on this aspect.

3. The petitioner joined service as an Excise Preventive Officer in the year 1998 and was promoted in the year 2003 as an Assistant Excise Inspector. He was included in Ext.P1 final seniority list of Assistant Excise Inspectors. Promotion there from is to the post of Excise Inspector which though

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top