PIUS C.KURIAKOSE
V. P. Pathu – Appellant
Versus
Tharamakkandy Ayishu – Respondent
The defendants 4 to 6, 8, 9, 12 to 19, 22 to 29, 31 and the legal representatives of the deceased defendant 32 are the appellants in this appeal which is directed against a decree of partition passed by the Subordinate Judges Court, Vadakara in a suit which was filed by the first respondent. Respondents 3 to 8 are respectively defendants 1 to 3, 7, 10, 11 and 20. On the basis of the rival pleadings, the learned Subordinate Judge formulated the following issues for trial;
1. Whether the plaintiff has got any right over the plaint schedule property and the house therein on the basis of the lease deed mentioned in the plaint ?
2. Whether the oral lease mentioned in the said lease deed is true?
3. Whether the executant of the lease deed had any right or possession to grant the lease ?
4. Whether the deceased Kadeesa was over in possession on the basis of the lease deed?
5. Whether defendants 4 to 15 are in occupation of the house as mentioned in the plaint ?
6. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to recovery of possession or partition as prayed in the suit ?
7. Whether the shares claimed in the plaint are correct ?
8. Whether the right of plaintiff and D1 to 3 if any is lost by
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.