T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, P.R.RAMAN
Elizebath George – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala, Represented By The Secretary to Government & – Respondent
Ramachandran Nair, J.
These writ petitions are filed seeking for the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus for the production of detenus, viz. Sri. Jojo George, Mujeeb Rahiman and Sheen Mondy Jose @ Saju; to release them and; to quash Ext.P1 order of detention. Since these writ petitioners raise common issues, they are heard together and are disposed of by a common judgment.
2. We have heard the learned Senior Counsel Sri. C.C. Thomas on behalf of the petitioners and the learned Additional Director General of Prosecutions, Sri. K.K.Ravindranath on behalf of the respondents.
.3. Theshort facts leading to the disposal of the cases are the following:-
.In W.P.(Crl) No.265/2008, the detenu is one Jojo George; in W.P. (Crl) No.266/2008, the detenu is one Mujeeb Rahiman and in W.P.(Crl) No.267/2008, the detenu is one Sheen Mondy Jose @ Sabu. The orders of detention are dated 25/06/2008, passed by the District Magistrate and District Collector, Palakkad. They have been issued under the power conferred on the said Officer by the Kerala Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 2007, (hereinafter referred to as the Act). It is stated in the respective orders that the detenus are acc
Kartic Chandra Guha v. The State of West Bengal and others (AIR 1974 SC 2149).
Usha Agarwal v. Union of India and others {(2007) 1 SCC 295}.
Smt. Icchu Devi Chorarias case (supra) {(1980) 4 SCC 531).
Naranjan Singh Nathawan v. State of Punjab (AIR 1952 SC 106).
Union of India v. Paul Manickam and another (AIR 2003 SC 4622).
Adishwar Jain v. Union of India and another {(2006) 11 SCC 339}.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.