H.L.DATTU, A.K.BASHEER
T. Lazer Robert – Appellant
Versus
C. M. Mohammed Sheriff – Respondent
Basheer, J.
The common appellant has filed these two writ appeals against the common judgment in two writ petitions; one filed by the appellant himself and the other by respondent No.1 herein.
(2) While the appellant in his writ petition had sought to quash the order passed by the Tribunal for Local Self Government Institutions confirming the cancellation of the building permit issued by the Corporation of Cochin in his favour, respondent No.1 in his writ petition had questioned the legality and propriety of the direction issued by the Tribunal to the Corporation to consider whether the alleged objectionable construction made by the appellant could be regularised, if such a request was made.
(3) Thelearned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellant and allowed the other filed by respondent No.1.
(4) Relevant facts may be briefly noticed.
(5) Theappellant, who admittedly owns 20 cents of land at Fort Kochi within the limits of Kochi Corporation, was granted a building permit to construct a four storied building. It appears that the appellant had carried out the construction violating several provisions in the Kerala Municipality Building Rules, 1999
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.