V.GIRI
Subramanian – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent
The constitutionality of certain provisions of the Kerala Protection of River Banks and Regulation of Removal of Sand Act, 2001 (hereinafter referred to as the "Sand Act") and the validity of some of the provisions contained in the Rules framed thereunder (hereinafter referred to as "the Rules") have been challenged in these writ petitions.
2. Challenge has been mounted in certain writ petitions against the proceedings taken for alleged contravention of the Act and the Rules framed thereunder, essentially resulting in the confiscation of the vehicles belonging to the petitioners. The competence of the State legislature to enact the Act in question itself has been questioned in some of the writ petitions, though the focus of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, in this regard, has also been centered around the validity of certain provisions in particular. Since, pleadings are complete in W.P. (C).No.15847 of 2008, I have taken up the same as the leading case. I have heard extensive arguments by the learned counsel for the petitioners, touching upon the legislative competence of the State legislature in passing the Act in question.
3. I heard lea
Hinger Rampur Coal Co. Ltd. v. State of Orissa {AIR 1961 SC 459}.
Saurashtra Cement and Chemical Industries v. Union of India {AIR 2001 SC 8}.
Alavi v. District Collector & Ors. {2007 (4) KLT 473}.
Ahammed Kutty v. State of Kerala {2008 (1) KLT 1068}.
Baijnath v. State of Bihar {AIR 1970 SC 1436}.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.