SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Ker) 639

C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, HARUN-UL-RASHID
Muhammed Raees – Appellant
Versus
High Court of Kerala – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:For the Petitioner:S. Sreekumar, Advocate. For the Respondents: No Appearance.

Judgment :-

Ramachandran Nair, J.

The appellant applied for selection to the post of District Judge in the Kerala Higher Judicial service and has come out successfully in the written examination conducted by the High Court of Kerala. He is one among the 45 candidates selected for the oral examination. The appellant had also applied for selection for appointment to the post of Munsiff/Magistrate in the Kerala Subordinate Judicial Service On being finally selected for the post, the Government vide Ext.P3 dated 27.2008 appointed him as Munsiff-Magistrate. Pursuant to the appointment the appellant is taken for training by the High Court along with other selected candidates and the appellant is still undergoing the said training. Since the appellant is included in the rank list for interview for selection to the post of District Judge he submitted an application to the 2nd respondent for permission to take part in the oral examination. However the Registrar (Subordinate Judiciary) High Court vide Ext.P6 informed the petitioner that he has ceased to be eligible for appointment to the post of District Judge as he has ceased to be a practising Advocate on appointment as Munsiff-Magistrate i








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top