SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Ker) 649

R.BASANT
Ayoob Ismail – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:For the Petitioner:R. Anil, Advocate. For The Respondents:P. Gopinath, Advocate.

Judgment :

Does the exoneration in departmental adjudication proceedings under the Customs Act ipso facto warrant or justify quashing of criminal prosecution against an indictee invoking the extraordinary inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C ? This is the question which I am called upon to consider in this Crl.M.C.

2. Petitioner faces indictment in C.C.No.34 of 2005 pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (Economic Offences), Ernakulam. That prosecution is under Section 135 of the Customs Act. There are 2 other accused in that case. The crux of the allegations is that the 1st accused was intercepted when he was in the process of an attempt to export foreign currency at the Airport. He was found to be in possession of foreign currency which he had not declared or could account for. When he was questioned and his statement was recorded, it appears that, he revealed that he had purchased the same from the petitioner herein. The petitioners premises were searched and allegedly incriminating documents were also seized from the possession of the petitioner. The requisite sanction was obtained and it was thereafter that the prosecution was initiated.

.3. Parallell























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top