Balakrishnan Nair, J.

The respondents in the Writ Petition are the appellants. The writ etitioner is the respondent herein. The learned Single Judge by the judgment under appeal, quashed Ext.P11 order of the Government dated 112.2008, as per which the respondent/writ petitioner was suspended from service, pending decision in the disciplinary enquiry going on against him. Aggrieved by the said decision of the learned Single Judge, the official respondents in the Writ Petition have filed this Writ Appeal.

2. The brief facts of the case are the following. The respondent filed the Writ Petition, making the following pleadings. He is presently working as Assistant Commandant in the Armed Police at Malappuram. He joined the police in 1991 and has rendered meritorious service for more than 17 years. He has received several good service entries. While so, a lady, hereinafter referred to as Mrs.X, started filing complaints against him repeatedly before various authorities. She is married to Mr.Y and two children are born in that wedlock. The respondent is also married and is living with his family at Alappuzha. The main complaint raised against him by Mrs.X was that he has commi