SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Ker) 263

K.T.SANKARAN
Sasikumar – Appellant
Versus
S. Bindu – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:K. Praveen Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondent:P.V. Dileep, Advocate.

Judgment:

The question involved in these Transfer Petitions is whether Section 21A of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 would apply to a situation where the husband has filed a petition for restitution of conjugal rights in a Family Court and thereafter the wife has filed a petition for divorce in another Family Court.

2. The wife is the petitioner in Tr.P.(C) No.44 of 2009 while the husband is the petitioner in Tr.P.(C) No.30 of 2009. The prayer made by the wife is to transfer the petition for restitution of conjugal rights filed by the husband, before the Family Court, Kozhikode to the Family Court, Ernakulam, where the petition for divorce filed by the wife is pending. The prayer made by the husband in the Transfer Petition filed by him is to transfer the petition for divorce filed by the wife before the Family Court, Ernakulam to the Family Court, Kozhikode, where the petition filed by the husband for restitution of conjugal rights is pending. It is not in dispute that the petition filed by the husband was earlier in point of time.

3. O.P.No.1792 of 2008 was filed by the wife before the Family Court, Ernakulam, seeking divorce under Section 13(1)(i-a) and 13(1)(i-b) of the Hindu Marr






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top