SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Ker) 632

V.RAMKUMAR
Padmakshy – Appellant
Versus
Madhavi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:For the Petitioner:N. Subramaniam, Advocate. For the Respondent:P.N. Krishnankutty Achan (SR.), Advocate.

Judgment :

The plaintiff in O.S. No. 52 of 1992 on the file of the Sub Court, Thrissur is the appellant in this appeal. The aforesaid suit instituted by the appellant was one for partition and separate possession of ¼ share over 8 items of immovable properties altogether admesuring 2.85 acres scheduled to the plaint. The properties are situated in the Vadanappilly village of Chavakkad Taluk which was part of the erstwhile South Malabar area.

2. All the 8 items of plaint schedule properties belonged to one Paran as allotted to him under Ext.A1 partition deed dated 04.11.1941. The parties are admittedly thiyas of South Malabar. Paran died in May, 1963 leaving behind him his widow Madhavi who was the first defendant who also died pending this appeal on 22.04.1998 and two daughters and one son. The plaintiff Padmakshy and the 3rd defendant Santhakumari are the two daughters of Paran and the 2nd defendant Ramakrishnan is the only son of Paran.

3. The case of the plaintiff can be summarised as follows:-

The plaint schedule properties originally belonged to deceased Paran, the husband of the 1st defendant and father of the plaintiff and defendants 2 and 3. The plaintiff and the defendants
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top