THOMAS P.JOSEPH
D. K. Rajendran – Appellant
Versus
P. K. Sajeendran – Respondent
Would closure of an account at the instance of the drawee bank before issuance of cheque take the subsequent dishonour of that cheque as account closed outside the purview of Sec.138 of Negotiable Instruments Act (for short, "the Act")?
2. Petitioner before me faced trial in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class-1, Kannur in C.C.No.441 of 2000 for offence punishable under Sec.138 of the Act. According to respondent No.1, petitioner borrowed Rs.90000/- from him on 20-03-00 and for repayment of that amount issued Ext.P2, cheque dated 22-05-2000. That cheque was dishonoured on 25-05-2000 as account was closed as proved by Exts.P1 and P3 and evidence of PW.1, manager of the drawee bank. As per his evidence account was closed on 03-08-1999. Respondent No.1 issued notice to the petitioner on 08-06-2000 intimating dishonour and demanding payment of the amount. That notice was served on petitioner on 08-06-2000. Respondent No.1 gave evidence as PW.2 and testified to his case. According to the petitioner, he had given a signed blank cheque to one Ramesan in the year, 1997 in connection with a transaction with him and that cheque was misused.
3. There is a content
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.