SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Ker) 475

THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN
Nishana Mol. N, – Appellant
Versus
Alappuzha Municipality – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:For the Petitioners:Rajit, Advocate. For the Respondents:M.K. Chandramohan Das, Advocate.

Judgment :

1. In view of the directions of the Apex Court in Seema v. Ashwani Kumar, 2006 (1) KLT 791, the Government of Kerala issued the Kerala Registration of Marriages (Common) Rules, 2008, hereinafter referred to as the "Common Rules". The question raised in this writ petition is as to whether both the parties to the marriage have to be present in person before the authority for registration of a marriage under the Common Rules.

2. The marriage of the petitioner was solemnized on 8.3.2009. The couple submitted the memorandum for registration of their marriage, in Form No.1 prescribed under the Common Rules before the Local Registrar, an officer so appointed in terms of Rule 5 of the Common Rules. The petitioner says that the certificate of marriage issued by the religious authority concerned, as document in proof of the marriage, and other relevant materials were produced along with the memorandum. The husband of the petitioner returned to a foreign country where he works. The petitioner complains that the Local Registrar is insisting on the presence of both the parties to the marriage for registration. That complaint is not disputed, but is corroborated by the submissions on b








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top