THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN
Nishana Mol. N, – Appellant
Versus
Alappuzha Municipality – Respondent
1. In view of the directions of the Apex Court in Seema v. Ashwani Kumar, 2006 (1) KLT 791, the Government of Kerala issued the Kerala Registration of Marriages (Common) Rules, 2008, hereinafter referred to as the "Common Rules". The question raised in this writ petition is as to whether both the parties to the marriage have to be present in person before the authority for registration of a marriage under the Common Rules.
2. The marriage of the petitioner was solemnized on 8.3.2009. The couple submitted the memorandum for registration of their marriage, in Form No.1 prescribed under the Common Rules before the Local Registrar, an officer so appointed in terms of Rule 5 of the Common Rules. The petitioner says that the certificate of marriage issued by the religious authority concerned, as document in proof of the marriage, and other relevant materials were produced along with the memorandum. The husband of the petitioner returned to a foreign country where he works. The petitioner complains that the Local Registrar is insisting on the presence of both the parties to the marriage for registration. That complaint is not disputed, but is corroborated by the submissions on b
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.