SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Ker) 434

S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN
Jose Peter – Appellant
Versus
C. K. Vijaya Kumar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:For the Petitioner:Sunil Kumar A.G. For the Respondent:B. Ramachandran, Advocate.

Judgment :

The question arising for consideration is whether the Court can pass an order to impound the passport of a judgment debtor in an execution proceedings on the apprehension raised by the decree holder that he is likely to leave the country, and thus, the decree holder would be deprived of realising the fruits of the decree.

2. The petitioner is the judgment debtor in E.P.No.253/2008 in O.S.No.152/2005 on the file of the Vadakara Munsiff Court. Suit was one for money which was decreed ex parte. The execution petition filed before the Munsiff Court, Vadakara was transferred to Munsiff court, Mancheri. The decree holder moved an application before that court under Section 151 of the CPC for an order to the Passport officer, Malappuram to impound the passport of the judgment debtor alleging that the judgment debtor who was in a gulf country has just now come back to his house, but, avoiding the notice and trying to leave the country. It is the further case of the decree holder that a long pending warrant issued by a Magistrate Court against the judgment debtor is pending for execution and that an attempt made by the decree holder to impound the passport of the judgment debtor t




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top