SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Ker) 380

S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN
John George – Appellant
Versus
Cheriyakunnil Koran – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:For the Petitioner:N.D. Joy, Advocate. For the Respondents:P. Babu, Advocate.

Judgment :

A counter claim set up by the defendant in a suit for injunction long after the filing of the written statement was declined to be entertained by the learned Munsiff, Taliparamba for the reason it was not accompanied by any petition for acceptance. Propriety and correctness of that order is impeached by the defendant in the Writ Petition invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of this court vested under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

2. Petitioner is the first defendant in O.S.No.215/07 on the file of the Munsiff Court, Taliparamba wherein he had filed the counter claim referred to earlier. The respondents in the petition are the plaintiff and the 2nd defendant in the suit. Admittedly, the suit was filed as early in June, 2007 and the petitioner/first defendant filed his written statement in August, 2007. The counter claim moved by him giving rise to this Writ Petition was presented before the court only on 4.6.08. True, the rejection of the counter claim by the learned Munsiff for the reason that a petition for leave to receive the counter claim was not filed is not appealing since it is only a curable irregularity, for which an opportunity could have been exten







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top