SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Ker) 374

S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN
Joy Cherian – Appellant
Versus
George Cherian – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:For the Petitioner:K. Jayakumar, Advocate. For the Respondent:R. Anilkumar, Advocate.

Judgment :

The writ petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs:

i. call for the records of A.S.No.110 of 2008 from the Subordinate Judge's Court, Perumbavoor,

ii. set aside Ext.P5 in exercise of the supervisory jurisdiction of this Hon'ble Court;

iii. pass an order dismissing I.A.No.88 of 2009 in A.S.No.110 of 2008 on the file of the Subordinate Judge's Court, Perumbavoor;

iv. grant the petitioner any other appropriate relief that this Honourable Court may deem fit to grant on the facts and in the circumstances of the case;

v. grant the petitioner such other appropriate interim reliefs that the petitioner prays from tie to time during the pendency of this writ petition.

vi. award the petitioner the costs of this writ petition.

2. Petitioner is the respondent in A.S.No.110/2008 on the file of the Sub Court, Perumbavoor. The appeal is filed by the respondent against the dismissal of his suit, O.S.No.199/2006 on the file of the Munsiff's Court, Perumbavoor, in which, he claimed reliefs of fixation of boundaries and perpetual prohibitory injunction against the defendant/petitioner in the writ petition. Ext.P1 is the judgment rendered b









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top