High Court Of Kerala
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. BASHEER & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. BHAVADASAN
K.Uma - Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala, Represented by the Additional Chief Secretary to Government - Respondents
W.P.(Crl.). No. 449 of 2008 (S)
Decided On : 19 February 2009
Kerala Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act 2007 -Section. 10( 3) Proviso - Two orders of detention issued by the District Magistrate (District Collector), Palakkad (hereinafter referred to as the 'authorised officer') under S.3(2) of the Kerala Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 2007, are under challenge in these two Writ Petitions filed by the spouses of the two detenus -Held, Detenus namely Santhosh, S/o. Natesh, 6/22, IVth Cross, Chamarajpet, Azad Nagar, Bangalore, Karnataka and Ramesh, Slo. Mallik Shetty, Ambaprasad Apartment, Near Uma Talkies, Samrajpet, Bangalore, Karnataka shall be released from detention forthwith, if their continued detention is not necessary in connection with any other cases - Petitions are disposed.
Basheer, J.
Two orders of detention issued by the District Magistrate (District Collector), Palakkad (hereinafter referred to as the 'authorised officer') under Section 3(2) of the Kerala Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 2007, are under challenge in these two writ petitions filed by the spouses of the two detenus.
2. Since the two orders of detention emanate from same set of facts and circumstances and since the grounds of challenge in both the petitions are identical, we are disposing of these two cases by this common judgment.
3. Relevant facts which are essential for considering the question of validity, legality and sustainability of the orders of detention may be briefly noticed.
4. In W.P.(Crl).No.449/2008, the authorized officer had issued Ext.P1 order of detention on October 31, 2008 by which it was directed that the detenu namely Sri. Ramesh, S/o Mallik Shetty, be placed under detention with immediate effect since he is a "known goonda" as defined under the Act. In the grounds of detention, a copy of which is on record as Ext.P2, it was stated by the authorized officer that the detenu along with the others had hatched a criminal conspiracy for smuggling illicit spirit to Kerala in lorry No.Kl 11Q 1903 by concealing the same under bags of cement and, by misusing brass tokens meant for Malabar Cements Ltd. to transport cement through Green channel at Walayar check post.
5. The lorry was intercepted by the excise authorities on January 24, 2008 at 13.45 hours at Sales tax Check Post, Walayar. 8540 litres of spirit was recovered from the vehicle. The brass tokens were also recovered. In connection with the above seizure of spirit the excise department had registered Crime No.3/2008 and it was transferred to the police department for further investigation. The above case is being investigated by Circle Inspector of Police, Kasaba in Crime No.26/2008 for offences punishable under Sections 407, 420, 120-B read with Section 34 I.P.C and under Section 55(a) of the Abkari Act.
6. It is further revealed from the grounds of detention that a special investigating unit under the control of Inter state Illicit Spirit Movement Investigation Team (ISISMIT) is in charge of the investigation and that the detenu along with some others had been party to the criminal conspiracy to smuggle spirit into Kerala by misusing brass tokens meant for transportation of cement from Malabar Cements Ltd through green channel at the check post. It is also revealed that the investigating agency had already arrested some of the accomplices of the detenu. Though the investigation is Complete charge sheet could not be laid against the accused since some of them are still at large. The grounds of detention also refer to an earlier episode of a similar crime involving the detenu. The allegation appears to be that the detenu along with some others had smuggled illicit spirit into Kerala in a lorry bearing Registration No.Kl 10 L 6047.
7. We do not propose to refer to the details of the above and other crimes which are referred to in Ext.P2 grounds of detention, in view of the order that we propose to pass in these two cases. Suffice it to say that the detenu Sri. Ramesh, who is allegedly involved in several cases of smuggling of illicit spirit to Kerala has been ordered to be detained on the basis of the subjective satisfaction arrived at by the authorized officer.
8. In W.P.(Crl.)No.464/2008, Sri Santhosh, S/o. Natesh, is the detenu. He is also alleged to have indulged in smuggling of illicit spirit to Kerala. The last such episode in which the detenu is allegedly involved is also in relation to seizure of 8500 litres of spirit from vehicle No.KL 11 Q 1903 referred to above. In this case, the order of detention was issued by the authorized officer on November, 20, 2008. In Ext.P2, the authorized officer refers to certain other crimes of similar nature as well, in which the detenu had been allegedly involved. Yet again, we do not deem it ne
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.