SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Ker) 680

M.N.KRISHNAN
Pampara Philip – Appellant
Versus
Koorithottiyil Kinhimohammed – Respondent


Advocates:
Babu Thomas, for Appellant; K. Gopala-krishna Kurup, for Respondent.

Judgement

JUDGMENT :- This is an appeal preferred against the decree in O.S. No. 126 of 1990 of the Sub Court, Kozhikode and also as against the counter claim filed by the defendant in the said case. The suit was one for return of advance amount of Rs. 14,000/- and some other amount due to the plaintiff. It is the case of the plaintiff that defendant agreed to sell a Jeep bearing Regn. No. KED 3290, a 1987 model and therefore he agreed to purchase it for Rs. 1,00,500/-. As per the agreement, an amount of Rs. 14,000/- was paid as advance on the date of agreement. An amount of Rs. 61,000/- was to be paid on 31-1-1990 and the balance amount of Rs. 25,500/-was to be paid on 28-2-1990. As the plaintiff wanted to raise some loan he got the document particulars from the defendant and forwarded to the financer and thereafter the financer informed him that the vehicle was a 1986 model. The plaintiff had entered into an agreement with the defendant bona fidely believing that the jeep is of 1987 model as represented by the defendant and that was the reason for the purchase of the jeep. It is the case of the plaintiff that the defendant has misrepresented and therefore he is entitled to the ret












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top