P.R.RAMAN
Maddthil Radha – Appellant
Versus
M. P. Ramachandran – Respondent
ORDER :- Plaintiffs are the appellants. They are Kudikidappukars under the defendant, who filed an application before the Land Tribunal, Thalasserry as O.A. 696 of 1970. They were issued with a purchase certificate as evidenced by Ext. A2 dated 27-12-1973. As per Ext. A2, they are entitled to 10 cents of land as Kudikidappu. The suit was instituted by them claiming a right of pathway to their Kudikidappu through the property of the defendant.
2. On the western side of the appellants Kudikidappu there is a pathway and it was specifically pleaded in the plaint that the plaintiffs" predecessors in interest were using this pathway, namely, plaint B schedule continuously and uninterruptedly for the last 50 years as of right. Plaint A schedule property originally belonged to the grand mother of the defendant. Raman, the father of the plaintiffs was residing in a hut in plaint A schedule property as a Kudikidap-pukaran with his family. It was then that Act 35/69 conferred certain benefits and Raman applied to the Land Tribunal as aforesaid.
3. After the death of Raman, plaintiffs are in possession of plaint A schedule property. The defendant constructed a new house on the southern
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.