SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Ker) 123

S.SANKARASUBBAN, A.LEKSHMIKUTTY
C. T. Joseph – Appellant
Versus
I. V. Philip – Respondent


Advocates:
T. R. Raman Pillai, for Appellant; M/s. T. P. Kolu Nambiar and P. G. Rajagopalan, for Respondent.

Judgement

SANKARASUBBAN, J.:- Both these appeals are filed against the judgment and decree in O.S. No. 258 of 1985 on the file of the Subordinate Judge's Court, Kottayam. A.S. No. 180 of 1991 is the appeal filed by the plaintiff, while A.S. No. 105 of 1991 is the appeal filed by the fourth defendant. The suit was filed for realisation of Rs. 2,06,985/-. The case of the plaintiff is as follows :

2. First defendant is a Partnership Firm carrying on the business of dealers in rubber in Paika. Defendants 2 to 6 are its partners and they are close relatives. The plaintiff was having dealings with the first defendant - Firm for more than 10 years. On a final settlement of accounts arrived at between the plaintiff and the first defendant represented by its partner the fourth defendant on 19-8-1985 the amount due to the plaintiff from the first defendant - Firm was settled at Rs. 2,06,985/-. The fourth defendant handed over to the plaintiff a cheque for the said amount drawn on Grindlays Bank, Wellington Island Branch, Cochin duly signed by the second defendant. When the cheque was presented on the request of the fourth defendant during the third week of October, 1985, it was dishonoured. Th

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top