Kerala High Court
P.SHANMUGAM
K.K.Viswanathan Master - Appellant
Versus
Lalitha Rajagopal - Respondent
Decided On : 11/11/1998
Election - Standing Committee - Kerala Panchayath Raj Act, 1994, Section 162(2), Rules 6(1), 6(3), 7A(b) - The court discussed the election process for the Standing Committee and the method of proportional representation by single transferable vote. It highlighted the inconsistency between the Act and the Rules and emphasized the need to conduct the election by proportional representation at the same time for all vacancies.
Fact of the Case:
The case involved the election to fill two vacancies in the Standing Committee of the Poothadi Grama Panchayat. The election was adjourned without declaring the results, leading to a dispute over the nomination process and the method of election.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the election should be conducted by proportional representation by single transferable vote and at the same time for all vacancies. It held that the Rules must be read in conformity with the provisions of the Act and directed the respondents to conduct the election accordingly.
Issues: The key issues were whether the election should be through proportional representation by a single transferable vote or by simple majority, and whether there was a valid nomination for the election.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the election should be conducted by proportional representation at the same time for all vacancies, as mandated by Section 162(2) of the Kerala Panchayath Raj Act, 1994. It held that the Rules must be consistent with the Act and directed the respondents to make suitable amendments to the rules.
Final Decision: The court directed the respondents to hold the election at the same time for the vacancies and to conduct it by the method of proportional representation by a single transferable vote. It also ordered the Government to make suitable amendments to the rules in consonance with the Act.
These Original Petitions relate to election to the two vacancies that arose in the Standing Committee of the Poothadi Grama Panchayat. There were five members in the Standing Committee out of which two members submitted their resignations on 9-11-1997 and 10-11-1997. In order to fill up the vacancy, the President issued a notice on 11-11-1997 for convening a meeting to hold the election to the post of two vacancies on 20-11-1997. There are 13 members in the Panchayath. All of them were present on the election day, viz. on 20-11-1997. In that meeting the 1st petitioner, Mr. K. K. Viswanathan Master and 4th respondent, Smt. Jancy Devassia in O.P. 21043 of 1997 were proposed and seconded. There were no other names suggested or nominated. Instead of declaring the two persons as elected as per Rule 6(1) of the Rules relating to Election of Members of the Standing Committee and Chairman, the President, who was functioning as Returning Officer dispersed the meeting without declaring the election, on the ground that some of the members have raised objection to the effect that the election to the posts fell vacant on different dates, and, therefore, the election cannot be conducted on the same day. The objections of the petitioners were recorded in the minutes. Under the circumstances the above Original Petition is filed seeking for a direction to declare them elected or in the alternative to hold the re-election on the same day for the vacancies.
2. Petitioners have prayed for quashing of subsequent notices called for at one hour intervals on the ground that the election has to be conducted at the same time.
3. Counter-affidavits have been filed by all the respondents. I heard the counsel and the respondents. Two important questions that arise for consideration in these Original Petitions are: (i) whether the election to the Standing Committee should be through proportional representation by a single transferable vote or it should be by simple majority; and (ii) whether there was any nomination for the election on 20-11-1997.
4. The case of the 1st respondent is that as per Rule 5 of the Rule relating to Election of Members of the Standing Committee, the candidate intending to contest should submit his nomination at the beginning of the meeting in writing to the President. No candidate has given in writing to the President informing his intention to contest as a candidate and, therefore, there was no valid nomination in the eye of law. The case of the petitioners is that the candidates, viz. K. K. Viswanathan Master and Smt. Jancy Devassia submitted their written nominations and they were proposed and seconded validly. However, the election was adjourned not on the ground that no nomination was made. There, at this stage, it is academic to go into the question whether there was a nomination or not since the election was not conducted. Besides, the respondents have taken the stand that election has to be conducted separately with intervals for each vacancy and, therefore, this point is the primary concern.
5. Section 162(2) of the Kerala Panchayath Raj Act, 1994, hereinafter referred to as 'the Act', states as follows :
"Every Standing Committee shall consist of members elected by the elected members of the Panchayat from among themselves through proportional representation by a single transferable vote."
(Emphasis added)
Therefore, the legislature has consciously decided to give weightage to different groups in a Panchayath and the legislature did not go by a single majority for the election to the members. Coming to the Rules, Rule 6(1) states that if the number of candidates and the vacancy of members are equal all such candidates shall be declared elected by the President. Sub-rule (3) of Rule 6 which is important is extracted below :
"If the number of candidates is more than the number of vacancies election shall be conducted among the members present under proportional representation by single transferable votes."
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.