A.R.LAKSHMANAN, K.NARAYANA KURUP
N. Sarojini – Appellant
Versus
Dist. Collector, Thiruvananthapuram – Respondent
NARAYANA KURUP, J.: - The petitioner in the Original Petitions is the appellant in both these writ appeals. The writ appeals are directed against the common judgement of the learned single Judge in O.P, 6194 and 10181 of 1998 dismissing the Original Petitions upholding the impugned orders therein. the brief facts of the case are as follows:
2. The appellant-petitioner is the licensee of a Wholesale Ration Shop viz; A.W.D. (Authorised Wholesale Depot) No. 16 of Nedumangad Taluk. On receipt of a complaint, the Controller of Rationing, Board of Revenue(CS), Trivandrum inspected the appellant's shop on 1-11-1997 and detected shortage of 241.89 quintals of Fine Boiled Rice and four other irregularities. The Controller suspended the authorisation of A.W.D as per proceedings No. CS-A5-46146/97 dated the District Collector, Trivandrum who in exercise of the powers conferred under Clause 51(8) of the Kerala Rationing Order passed Ext. P2 order in O.P. No. 6194 of 1998-K finding that there was shortage and that the cost of rice found short as reported by the Controller of rationing will be recovered from the appellant and the entire security deposit to be forfeited to the Government.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.