SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Ker) 419

Kerala High Court
U.P.SINGH,S.SANKARASUBBAN
Relly Susan Mathew - Appellant
Versus
Controller of Entrance Examinations, Trivandrum - Respondent
Decided On : 12/13/1996

Advocates:
T. R. Ramachandran Nair, for Petitioner; K. K. Ravindranath, Govt. Pleader and M. V. S. Nampoothiry (for No. 3), for Respondents.

The court upheld the legality of the selection of candidates who appeared for only one of the two papers in the Entrance Examination but were ranked high in the rank list based on the total marks obtained.

Headnote:

JUDGEMENT : Selection - Engineering and Medical Courses - Amendment to Prospectus - Fresh option for courses and colleges - Validity of procedure for selecting persons in the seat reserved for sports, games and N.C.C. - Alleged malpractice in the conduct of the Entrance Examination - Selection of candidates for admission to professional courses who have appeared for only one of the two papers in the Entrance Examination

Fact of the Case:

The original petitions alleged corruption in the conduct of the Entrance Examination for the admission to professional courses in the year 1996. Various allegations were made, including copying, manipulation in the results, and discrimination against candidates from certain districts. The learned single Judge considered these allegations and found no basis for them. The judgment also declared the selection of nine persons as illegal and directed the authorities to cancel their selection or admission to the engineering course. The appellants in the related writ appeals sought leave from the court as they were not parties in the original petitions and filed the appeals. The appellants did not appear for their Mathematics Examination for reasons stated in the appeal memorandum but obtained high ranks in the rank list based on the marks obtained in Physics and Chemistry.

Finding of the Court:

The court found the amendment made to the Prospectus for Engineering and Medical Courses to be valid. It also found no illegality in allowing candidates to exercise fresh options regarding courses and colleges, and in allowing candidates to produce certificates at the time of the interview. The court also upheld the validity of the procedure for selecting persons in the seat reserved for sports, games, and N.C.C. It dismissed the allegations of malpractice in the conduct of the Entrance Examination and found no illegality in selecting candidates for admission to professional courses who had appeared for only one of the two papers in the Entrance Examination but were ranked high in the rank list based on the total marks obtained.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found no basis for the allegations of corruption in the conduct of the Entrance Examination and upheld the legality of the selection of candidates who appeared for only one of the two papers in the Entrance Examination but were ranked high in the rank list based on the total marks obtained.

Final Decision: The court upheld the validity of the amendment made to the Prospectus for Engineering and Medical Courses, the procedure for allowing candidates to exercise fresh options regarding courses and colleges, and the procedure for selecting persons in the seat reserved for sports, games, and N.C.C. It dismissed the allegations of malpractice in the conduct of the Entrance Examination and found no illegality in selecting candidates for admission to professional courses who had appeared for only one of the two papers in the Entrance Examination but were ranked high in the rank list based on the total marks obtained.

Judgement

SANKARASUBBAN, J.:- The subject matter of these cases is selection to the Engineering and allied courses and M.B.B.S. and allied courses in the colleges in Kerala for the year 1996. Separate prospectus is issued for the Engineering and allied courses and M.B.B.S. and allied courses. The admission is made on the basis of the rank obtained in the Entrance Examination conducted by the Controller of Entrance Examinations.

2. For our convenience, we have grouped the cases into three groups. We heard learned counsel for the petitioners, the Advocate General and other counsel appearing for the respondents. A number of counsel entered appearance. The matter was argued threadbare. We are disposing of these cases on the main disputes raised. We have not considered the individual questions raised. According to us, they are to be looked into by the authorities.

Group No. 1

O. P. Nos. 12291, 12364, 12828, 12833, 12986, 13338, 13340, 13424, 13543, 13571, 13619, 13865, 13870, 13950, 14019, 14038, 14140 of 1996.

...................................

3. Admissions to the various Professional Colleges in Kerala, viz. Engineering, Medicine, Agriculture etc. are done on the basis of an entrance examination conducted by the Controller of Examinations. Previously, separate entrance examinations were conducted for Engineering and allied courses and for M.B.B.S. and allied courses. From the year 1996-97, Government have adopted a scheme of common entrance examination for both Engineering and Medicine. The subjects in which the examinations were conducted are Physics and Chemistry, Mathematics, Biology. The prospectus is issued by the Director of Technical Education Department in the case of Engineering and allied courses and Director of Medical Education in the case of M.B.B.S. and allied courses. The prospectus detailed the courses offered and also catalogued various other informations necessary for the admission. Among other things, the candidate has to indicate choice of college and course in the application. In the case of persons entitled to reservation, they have to produce community certificate. In the case of Backward Classes, in addition to the community certificate, they have to produce income certificate showing that the annual income of the parents is not more than Rs.42,000/-. There were many other prescriptions. The prospectus also stated that the candidates will not be allowed to change the option regarding the college or course subsequently and also that they will not be allowed to produce certificates subsequently.

4. The common entrance examinations for Engineering, Medicine and Agriculture and allied courses for the year 1996-97 were conducted on l8th and l9th of May, 1996. Subsequently, a common rank list was published on 24-6-1996. In the meantime, Government felt the necessity to change the policy with regard to admissions to the self-financing Engineering Colleges in the State. The question that came up for consideration by the Government was regarding the payment seats available in the above colleges. Government was of the view that 50% of the seats in the self-financing colleges should be made free seats in the interest and welfare of meritorious students who found it difficult to get admissions due to financial strains. Hence, pending final decision on the issue, a direction was issued on 6-7-1996 to the Commissioner for Entrance Examinations to postpone the interview and admission to the courses and to fix fresh dates. Subsequently, in the meeting convened on 16-7-1996, Government decided that the interview would commence on 25-7-1996 and admissions would be made to all the Government Engineering Colleges, Engineering Colleges run by the Institute of Human Resources Development in Electronics (IHRDE) and Lal Bahadur Sastri Centre for Science and Technology (LBSC) and free seats in aided Engineering Colleges







































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top