SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Ker) 353

Kerala High Court
P.A.MOHAMMED
Haridasan Mathilakath - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
Decided On : 12/18/1995

Advocates:
M/s. John L. Akkara, C.S. Dias, Jose Kuriakose K. and Mini Dias, for Petitioner; M.V. Nampoothiry, Addl. Central Govt. Standing Counsel, for Respondents.

The right to travel abroad is a fundamental right, and inordinate delay in issuing a passport tantamounts to refusal of passport.

Headnote:

Passport - Adoption - The right to travel abroad is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution. Inordinate delay in issuing a passport tantamounts to refusal of passport. The adoptive father's request to describe him and his wife as father and mother in the passport was not allowed. The court directed the passport to be issued within 10 days with the adoptive father and mother described as such.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, an adoptive father, sought a direction to issue a passport for his adopted minor child, citing inordinate delay by the Regional Passport Officer.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the delay in issuing the passport was unjustified and directed the Regional Passport Officer to issue the passport within 10 days, with the adoptive father and mother described as such.

Issues: Inordinate delay in issuing the passport, request to describe adoptive father and mother as father and mother in the passport.

Ratio Decidendi: The right to travel abroad is a fundamental right, and inordinate delay in issuing a passport tantamounts to refusal of passport. The adoptive father's request to describe him and his wife as father and mother in the passport was not allowed.

Final Decision: The court directed the Regional Passport Officer to issue the passport within 10 days with the adoptive father and mother described as such.

ORDER:-

The apex Court as early as in the year 1978 declared that the right to travel abroad is a fundamental right coming within the purview of Article 21 of the Constitution. (Menaka Gandhi v. Union of India, AIR 1978 SC 597). Once it is recognised as a fundamental right, all the requirements prescribed for the preservation of that right shall be observed 'stricto sensu'. The procedure regulating the travel must be fair and reasonable. The passport is a document which regulates the right to travel abroad. At least one High Court in India has declared that the inordinate delay in issuing the passport tantamounts to refusal of passport. (Ikhlaq Mohammed v. Union of India, AIR 1983 Him Pra 75). Of course, it depends on the facts and circumstances of each case. Ordinarily, if there is inordinate delay in issuing the passport this Court will not approve it.

2. The petitioner in this case is the adoptive father of a minor child called 'Sidharth Haridasan'. By Ext. P1 order, the Bombay City Civil Court allowed the adoption of the child on 4-10-1993 under the provisions of Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956. Ext. P2 is the copy of the deed of adoption. Later, the petitioner filed Ext. P4 application for passport in favour of his adopted child before the 2nd respondent, the Regional passport Officer, Cochin. Along with the said application the petitioner has submitted the order of the City Civil Court, Bombay and also the copy of the deed of adoption. Though the application was presented on 11-9-1995, timely action was not taken by the 2nd respondent. It was in that background the petitioner filed the present writ petition before this Court on 27-11-1995 praying for a direction to the 2nd respondent to issue passport in favour of his adopted minor child 'Sidharth Haridasan'.

3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the Central Government Standing Counsel for the respondents 1 and 2.

4. A counter-affidavit has been filed on behalf of the 2nd respondent. Ext. R4 is the letter issued by the 2nd respondent pointing out certain defects in the application for passport filed by the petitioner. One of such defects is that photograph of the adopted child has not been certified by the Court. Secondly; it was pointed out that the petitioner has requested the 2nd respondent to describe him as father and his wife as mother in the passport to be issued in favour of the minor child. These two defects, according to the Standing Counsel are the reasons for delay in issuing the passport. As far as the first defect is concerned, the counsel for the petitioner brings to my notice the practice that was prevalent in the Bombay City Civil Court at the time when Ext. P1 order was passed. In order to augment this point, the counsel has invited my attention to the letter dated 19-10-1995 sent by M/s. Rakesh Kapoor and Co., Advocates, High Court of Bombay (Ext. P9). The said letter was produced along with the application for passport. It inter alia states that practice of affixing the photograph in the order of the Court was introduced only from July, 1994. In other words, at the time when Ext. P1 order was processed by the Bombay City Civil Court the practice of affixing the photograph was not insisted. That appears to be the reason for not affixing the photograph of the minor child in the order of the Court. In order to wipe off all doubts regarding the identity of the adopted child, the petitioner has produced Exts. P8, P9, P12, P13 and P14. All these documents would sufficiently establish the identity of the minor child for whom the application for passport was filed. That being the position, I do not think it proper to delay the process of issuing the passport any further. As far as the second reason is concerned, the request made by the petitioner to the 2nd respondent cannot be allowed. The father and mother of the adopted minor child shall be described as 'adoptive father' and 'adoptive mother' in the passport and all other




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top