SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Ker) 127

T.L.VISWANATHA IYER
Syed Fazal Pookoya Thangal – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates:
M. K. Damodaran, for Petitioner; M. A. Manhu, for Respondent No. 1.

JUDGEMENT :-

For the first time in the history of this State the jurisdiction under Section 4(2) of the Muslim Women (Protec­tion of Rights on Divorce) Act 25 of 1986 (the Act) was invoked when the Judicial Magis­trate of the First Class, Perinthalmanna pass­ed order on September 30, 1992, directing the Kerala Wakf Board to make payment of maintenance to one Jameela, daughter of Chenangara Avaran, at the rate of Rs. 250/- ­per month. A copy of this order is Ext.P1 and it was passed in Maintenance Case No. 2 of 1990 on the file of the said Magistrate. Jameela is a divorced Muslim wife, who moved the court for relief under Section 3 of the Act and was granted a sum of Rs. 15,400/­- by the order in M.C. No. 59 of 1986. She could however realise only an amount of Rs. 6,000/- out of the amount so granted, by attachment and sale of the property of her ex-husband the respondent in that case. The ex-husband was sent to jail for non-payment of the balance amount. Jameela had no property, or source of income, to maintain herself and her three children. Her near relatives (and legal heirs) were her parents, but they were unable to maintain her because of their impecuniosity. Therefore, Jameel




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top