SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Ker) 194

U.L.BHAT
Hema – Appellant
Versus
S. Lakshmana Bhat – Respondent


Advocates:
R. Raya Shenoi, for Petitioner; R.D. Shenoi, for Respondent.

ORDER :- Revision petitioner is the wife of the respondent. They are governed by the provisions of the Hindu Marriage Act (for short 'the Act'). They were married on 24-8-1975 and lived together till December, 1979. Thereafter, they have been living apart. Each has his/her own explanation for the present state of affairs.

2. Husband filed H.M.O.P.4/1983 seeking divorce under S.13 of the Act and the wife filed written statement resisting the petition. On 5-7-1983 she filed I.A.957/1983 claiming maintenance pendente lite at the rate of Rs.2,500/- per month and also Rs.2,000/- as expenses for conducting the case from the husband. Husband resisted the application and the learned Subordinate Judge disposed of the application directing the husband to pay maintenance pendente lite at the rate of Rs.800/- per month from 5-7-1983 and to pay a sum of Rs.1,000/- as expenses of the proceedings. The wife, being dissatisfied with the quantum awarded, has filed this revision.

3. Husband is a well placed businessman in Mattancherry. He as well as his wife have affluent background and belong to trading families. Evidently, the wife has lost her father. She is at present living with her relations name


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top