SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Ker) 201

SUKUMARAN
S. V. Purushothaman – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


Advocates:
M.M. Cheriyan, Asok M. Cherivan and Poly Mathai, for Petitioner.

JUDGEMENT :-

A former Judge of the Supreme Court, referred about three years back, in a manner characteristic of him, to the 'public inquiries jurisprudence' and the 'harvest of Commission litigation' developing in this country. The jurisprudence indeed seems to develop and the commission litigation' appears to be on the increase. This writ petition deals with some facets, some unique facets, of such a litigation.

2. The Government of Kerala have been taking steps for enacting the Kerala Public Men (Inquiries) Bill. It is so stated in the order of the Government, G.O. Ms. No.386 dated 20-12-1969. Pending the enactment of such a Bill the Government considered it necessary to set up a machinery to inquire into allegations of misconduct against public men. The Government Order G.O.M.S. No.386 was issued to provide for a machinery for such inquiry. That order is produced as Ext.P-1 in this writ petition. 'Public men' included among others a Minister of State including the Chief Minister. A person seeking an inquiry had to address a petition to the Chief Secretary to Government requesting for such an enquiry into the allegations of misconduct. 'Misconduct' is given a fairly wide definiti












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top