GEORGE VADAKKEL
Choyyan Narayani – Appellant
Versus
Ibrahim Kunhi – Respondent
The suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale of a small strip of land described in the plaint schedule as having an extent of 2 cents but actually having an area of 2- cents was decreed by the lower courts and the defendant has come up in appeal. The suit property adjoins a plot of land 12 cents in extent purchased by the respondents' mother Kunhalima from the defendant as per Ext. A-1 sale deed dated 26-5-1962. The lower courts accepting the evidence of P. W. 1, the 3rd plaintiff and P. W. 2, an attestor to Ext. A-2 receipt, found that the defendant on 13-4-1969 agreed with Kunhalima to sell this strip of land to the latter for Rs. 350/-, that Kunhalima paid Rs. 300/- to the defendant, and that the defendant passed Ext. A-2 receipt therefore.
2. P. W. 1 swears to these facts and P. W. 2, to the payment of Rs. 300/- and the passing of Ext. A-2 receipt. The lower courts believed them, and nothing has been brought to my notice which would go to show that these witnesses are not worthy of credence. Ext. C-1 Commission report and Ext. C-2 plan show that a substantial portion of plaintiffs' latrine abuts into the suit property. According to Ext. C-1 report "it i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.