SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(Ker) 45

G.BALAGANGADHARAN NAIR, K.K.NARENDRAN, V.BALAKRISHNA ERADI, V.P.GOPALAN NAMBIYAR, GEORGE VADAKKEL
State of Kerala – Appellant
Versus
Miss Rafia Rahim etc. – Respondent


Advocates:
Govt. Pleader (in W. A. No. 309 of 1977), Advocate General (In W. A. No. 312 of 1977), P.K. Shamsuddin, A.A. Abdul Hasan, S.K. Abdulla and K.K. Abu (In W. A. Nos. 314, 315, 318, 319, 329, 334, 342, 343 of 1977), K.S. Rajamony and A. Shahul Hameed (In W. A. No. 317 of 1977), P. K. Appa Nair (In W. A. No. 331 of 1977), Chandrasekharan and Chandrasekhara Menon (In W. A. No. 333 of 1977), V. Sankara Menon (in W. A. No. 336 of 1977) and M.V. Bose (In W. A No. 348 of 1977), for Appellants; G. Janardana Kurup (In W. A. No.
309 of 1977), Panicker and Potti (In W. A. No. 312 of 1977), Advocate General (for Nos. 1 and 2), K.P. Radhakrishna Menon, K.K. Ravindranathan and V.V. Ravindran (for No. 3), B. Moosakutty (for No. 4) in W. A. Nos. 314, 315, 318, 319, 329, 333, 334, 336, 342, 343 and 348); Panicker and Potti (for No. 1), Advocate General (for Nos. 2 and 3), C.M. Kuruvilla (for Nos. 4 and 5) in W. A. No. 317 of 1977 and Advocate General (for Nos. 1 and 2), B. Moosakutty (for No. 3), K.P. Radhakrishna Menon, K.K. Ravindranathan and V.V. Ravindran (for No. 4) in W. A. No. 331 of 1977, for Respondents.

Judgement

GOPALAN NAMBIYAR, C.J. :- These appeals are against the decision of a learned Judge and raise the question of the validity of the prevailing system of admissions to the medical colleges of this State. The grounds of attack raised in writ petitions which have given rise to these appeals, may be classified under two broad heads : attack against the reservation of a certain proportion of seats to be filled up from the geographical limits of what is generally referred to as the "Malabar area" of this State; and attack basically against the scheme of admissions to the medical colleges in this State on an assessment of the merit of students drawn from different Universities, stated to be with no uniformity of standards in the matter of syllabus or curriculum of studies, or assessment of results. The learned Judge, to state again broadly, upheld the challenge against the reservation of a proportion of seats to students from the Malabar area, and held that the said reservation was unconstitutional; against which, the State and party-respondent have preferred appeals. Regarding the regulation of admission of students drawn from different Universities with no uniformity of standards

















































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top