SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(Ker) 19

M.MADHAVAN NAIR
Kesava Kurup Raghava Kurup – Appellant
Versus
Thomas Idicula – Respondent


Advocates:
K.N. Narayanan Nair, G. Raghava Panicker and N. Sudhakaran, for Appellant; K.C. John, for Respondent No. 1.

JUDGMENT :-

This appeal is by the 2nd defendant in a suit for declaration of title and for redemption.

2. P. W. 4 has mortgaged the plaint schedule property to the 1st defendant under Exhibit P-2, dated March 23, 1955, and thereafter assigned his equity of redemption to the plaintiff under Ext. P-1 dated June 23, 1955. This suit has been instituted on January 13, 1956, impleading the 2nd defendant also on the allegation that the 1st defendant has collusively surrendered the mortgaged property to him. The 2nd defendant denied P. W. 4 and the plaintiff to have any right to or possession of the property, and contended it to have originally belonged to Niravath tarwad, who in 1082 M. E. (1907) mortgaged it to Raman Kesavan and subsequently partitioned the equity of redemption under Ext. D-5 among its members out of whom Lakshmi Amma who got 12 cents of the property sold it to the aforesaid Raman Kesavan who under Ext. D-2 dated 3-4-1116 (November 1940) gifted all his interests in the property to his brother's daughter Narayani (he had no issue and Narayani was living with him as his foster-daughter) and her husband Narayanan Kesavan, who assigned to the 2nd defendant under Exts. D-3 and











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top