K.SURENDRA MOHAN, PIUS C.KURIAKOSE
Sasikumar – Appellant
Versus
R. C. R. P. No. 192 of 2009 – Respondent
K. Surendra Mohan, J.
This is a tenants’ revision against an order of eviction passed by the Rent Control Court, Neyyantinkara, in R.C.P. No.15/2000 and confirmed by the Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thiruvananthapuram, R.C.A. No.31/2006.
2. The Rent Control Petition was filed in respect of two shop rooms occupied by the revision petitioners/tenants. One tenant is conducting a medical store while the other is conducting a bakery. The landlady claimed eviction on the grounds of arrears of rent (S.11(2)(b)) and bona fide own occupation (S.11(3)) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965, hereinafter referred to as the "Act" for short. The Rent Control Court found that the ground under S.11(2)(b) was not available to the landlady for the reason that a notice of demand, as contemplated by the Section, had not been served on the tenants. The said finding has become final. Therefore, the only ground that survives is the ground under S.11(3).
3. According to the landlady, her husband is an air conditioner mechanic working in the Gulf. He has returned to his native place and he is unemployed now. The rooms, according to the landlady, were needed for starting
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.