SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Ker) 1055

K.SURENDRA MOHAN, P.R.RAMAN
Rajamma Joseph – Appellant
Versus
Binu Prasad – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:Alias M. Cherian, Advocate. For the Respondents:M.C. John, Advocate.

Judgment :

SURENDRA MOHAN, J.

The plaintiff in O.S.320/2003 of the Sub Court, Kottayam has preferred the above appeal challenging an order dated 20.3.2009 passed by the Sub Court dismissing I.A.3441/2003. The petition was filed seeking permission of the Court to institute the suit as an indigent person. The Court has dismissed the petition finding that the appellant/petitioner was possessed of sufficient means to pay the requisite court fee. The said order is under challenge in this appeal.

2. The appellant had filed the suit for the recovery of an amount of Rs.7,67,625/- with future interest from the respondents/defendants. According to the appellant, the defendants had borrowed an amount of Rs.7.5 lakhs from her and had executed a demand promissory note for the said amount in her favour, on 16.3.2003. Thereafter, the defendants paid the interest without default till July 2003. However, the principal amount was not paid. Therefore, the appellant demanded payment of the said amount. Thereupon the defendants issued a cheque dated 20.7.2003 to her. However, when the cheque was presented for encashment the same was returned dishonoured due to insufficiency of funds in the bank account.























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top