THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN
Ramaswamy – Appellant
Versus
Kamaraj Ponnuswamy – Respondent
"CR"
1. Petitioners are respondents in different petitions filed by the first respondent before the Kerala State Election Commission under Section 4 of the Kerala Local Authorities (Prohibition of Defection) Act, 1999, for short, the "Act".
2. The first respondent sent a petition to the Commission on 2.2.2009 by registered post alleging that the writ petitioners committed defection. The Commission's office received that on 4.2.2009, well within the period of fifteen days prescribed in Rule 4A(2) of the Kerala Local Authorities (Disqualification of Defected Members) Rules, 2000, for short, the "Rules".
3. Going by the files, the Commission's Secretary sent a letter by ordinary post on 16.2.2009 to the first respondent stating that the petition submitted through registered post could not be acted upon and that if the first respondent is desirous of filing petitions, he has to do so in terms of Civil Procedure Code either in person or through counsel. The first respondent pleads to have not got that. He thereafter filed different petitions under Section 4(1) of the Act and applied for condonation of delay in terms of clause 2 of Rule 4A of the Rules. The Commission condoned
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.