"C.R."

1. Notice to second respondent dispensed with, preserving his right to move for rehearing of this writ petition, if aggrieved. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and for the first respondent Corporation.

2. Petitioners and second respondent are neighbours. The Corporation initiated certain proceedings against the petitioners, referable to a stair case constructed by them. Proceedings were initiated against the second respondent regarding a car porch constructed by him. The Tribunal for Local Self Government Institutions set aside both those proceedings as per Ext.P2 and P3 orders with direction to finalise the matter by initiating fresh proceedings. Petitioners complain that nothing has followed Exts.P2 and P3 issued in January, 2009. They accordingly seek directions.

3. In its essence, on the plea that the Tribunal's verdict is not being given effect to, intervention in exercise of constitutional power of this Court is applied for, to effectuate the direction of a statutory Tribunal. Is it necessary that such orders are issued by this court? Is there any alternate efficacious remedy for the citizen? Is the citizen to be compelled to move the High Court und