High Court of Kerala
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. BHAVADASAN
Thrissur District Petroleum Dealers
Versus
State Of Kerala, Rep. By Its Secretary & Others
WA.No.1724 of 2009
Decided on : 29-09-2009
Kerala Motor Vehicles Rules 1989 - Rules.304 and 334 - Motor Vehicles Act 1988 - Sections.110( 1) and 111 - Central Motor Vehicles Rules 1989 - Rule. 90 - Additional Conditions for national permit - Power of State Government to make rules - Power of Central Government to make rules - The Writ Petitioner is the appellant. The Writ Petition was filed, challenging Ext.P6 order of the Government, withdrawing Ext.P2. The learned Single Judge dismissed the Writ Petition. Hence this appeal. The appellant is an Association of Petroleum dealers in Thrissur district. It is plying tanker lorries for the transport of petroleum products. How the vehicles, transporting dangerous and hazardous materials should be painted, is provided in R.90(1) of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, framed by the Central Government, in exercise of its power under S.110(1)(l) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Whether State Government if has competency to frame R.304 ? Where petitioner/appellant has no case on merits, is remand if should be made ? Held, The stipulations regarding painting of goods vehicles, transporting dangerous or hazardous articles are contained in R.90(1) of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules. Though the Central Government have the power to relax the rigour of the provisions of the said Rule under S.110(3), we are told that the Central Government have, so far, not issued any notification concerning the same. Going by S.111 of the Motor Vehicles Act, we notice that the State Government have no power to frame rules regarding matters covered by S.110(1) - The State Government have framed a rule, for which it has no power and later, granted exemption from it. Still later, it withdrew the exemption. All these exercises were futile exercises, as all along, R.90 of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules was alive and kicking. The violation of that rule remained as an offence punishable under S.177 of the Motor Vehicles Act - R.304 has been framed by the State Government validly. The purpose of the rule is to give a fair warning to all persons using the road that a vehicle, carrying dangerous or hazardous materials is plied through the road. So, those who want, can take precautionary measures like steering clear of the said vehicle. The Government granted exemption from the said rule as per Ext.P2, to suit the convenience of the third respondent - Later, the Government realised that public safety is paramount and owing to increase of vehicle population, it is not proper to continue the exemption. Therefore, it decided to withdraw the exemption and issued Ext.P6. Going by the reasons given in Ext.P6, Court find it difficult to describe the same as arbitrary or irrational - This is a Writ Petition, filed challenging Ext.P4, canceling the earlier order, sanctioning colour alteration to the tanker lorry of the petitioner. In view of the Judgment, the petitioner has to paint his vehicle as provided in R.90(1) of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules/Rule 304 of the Kerala Motor Vehicles Rules. Therefore, the Writ Petition fails and it is accordingly dismissed - Constitution of India,1950 - Article.226
Balakrishnan Nair, J.
WA No.1724/09
The Writ Petitioner is the appellant. The Writ Petition was filed, challenging Ext.P6 order of the Government, withdrawing Ext.P2. The learned Single Judge dismissed the Writ Petition. Hence this appeal. The brief facts of the case are the following :
2. The appellant is an Association of Petroleum dealers in Thrissur district. It is plying tanker lorries for the transport of petroleum products. How the vehicles, transporting dangerous and hazardous materials should be painted, is provided in Rule 90(1) of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, framed by the Central Government, in exercise of its power under S.110(1)(l) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The said statutory provision reads as follows :
"90. Additional Conditions for national permit : The national permit issued under subsection (12) of Section 88 shall be subject to the following additional conditions namely :
(1) The vehicle plying under a national permit shall be painted in dry leaf brown colour with thirty centimetres broad white boarders and the words "National Permit" shall be inscribed on both sides of the vehicle in bold letters within a circle of sixty centimetres diameter. Provided that the body of a tanker carrying dangerous or hazardous goods shall be painted in white colour with a dry leaf brown ribbon of 5 centimetres width around in the middle at the exterior and that the driver's cabin in orange colour." (emphasis supplied)
Sub-section (3) of S.110 of the Motor Vehicles Act enables the Central Government to relax the rigour of any rule framed under Chapter VII of the Motor Vehicles Act. S.110
comes under Chapter VII. The said sub-section also enables the State Government to exempt any of the rules framed by the Central Government under Chapter VII of the Motor Vehicles Act, subject to any conditions that may be prescribed by the Central Government. Sub-section (3) of S.110 of the Motor Vehicles Act reads as follows :
"Notwithstanding anything contained in this section -
(a) the Central Government may exempt any class of motor vehicles from the provisions of this Chapter ;
(b) a State Government may exempt any motor vehicle or any class or description of motor vehicles from the rules made under sub-section (1) subject to such conditions as may be prescribed by the Central Government."
The State Government have also framed Rule 304 of the Kerala Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989, governing painting of vehicles, carrying hazardous and dangerous goods. The said rule reads as follows :
"304 - Painting: Every goods vehicles shall be painted in Highway yellow colour either fully or its front and rear portion in highway yellow colour :
Provided that the body of a goods carriage used to carry dangerous or hazardous goods shall be painted in white colour with a dry brown leaf ribbon of 5 cm. Width around in the middle at the exterior and that the driver's cabin in orange colour :
Provided also that this rule shall not apply to goods vehicles covered by National Permits, Composite Permits and goods vehicles belonging to the Police Department and the goods vehicles temporarily registered under S.43 of the Act." (emphasis supplied)
The first proviso to Rule 304 is, in fact, a re-production of the proviso to sub-rule (1) of Rule 90 of the Central Rules, which we have already quoted hereinabove. Rule 334 of the Kerala Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 empowers the State Government to grant exemption from the operation of any of the provisions of the Rules in Chapter VII of the Kerala Motor Vehicles Rules, including Rule 304.
3. On the motion made by the third respondent Hindustan Petroleum Corporation, the Government issued Ext.P2 order, invoking its power under Rule 334 of the Kerala Motor Vehicles Rules, exempting the vehicles of the third respondent Company from the operation of Rule 304. The said order reads as follows :
"Rule 304 of the Kerala Motor Vehicles Rules 1989 has been amended in the G.O. read above, specifying the colo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.