P.R.RAMAN, P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
Sunderlal – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
Raman, J.
Appellant was the applicant before the Railway Claims Tribunal, who sustained severe injuries, as a result of an accident occurred while traveling as a passenger in a train. While he was traveling from Trichur to Ernakulam on 1.7.1999 by Jammu Tawi-Kanyakumari Express, and when the train was negotiating through Edappally and when he was about to go to bath room, as a result of a jerk, he was thrown out from the train and sustained injuries to his head and chest. He claimed compensation of an amount of Rs.4 lakhs with interest. The Railways, on the other hand, contended that he was not a bona fide passenger in the train. It was further contended that the records pertaining to the incident was not available at Eadppally railway station. It was alleged that the accident, if any happened, was due to his careless and negligent act, and hence, the railway is absolved from liability to pay compensation, as provided under Section 124A (b) of the Railways Act.
2. The Tribunal framed necessary issues. The evidence consists of oral testimony of Pws.1 to 3 and Exts.A1 to A24 marked on the side of the appellant. There was no evidence on the side of the Railways.
3. The Trib
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.