SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Ker) 110

High Court of Kerala
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N. RAVINDRAN
T.K. Karunadas, Technical Assistant, Information Centre, Kerala Archaeology Department
Versus
K.R. Sona & Others
WA.No. 2745 of 2009
Decided on : 10-02-2010

Advocates Appeared:For the Petitioners:Elvin Peter P.J., Pooja Surendran, Advocates. For the Respondent:O.V. Radhakrishnan (Sr.), N.D. Premachandran, Mohammed Niyaz, Advocates, Benny Gervasis, Government Pleader.

The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for appointments, declaration of probation, and promotions to be made in accordance with the Special Rules governing qualifications and method of appointment to the posts in the Archaeology Department.

Headnote:

Promotion - Archaeology Department - Kerala Archaeological Subordinate Service Rules - Ext.P9, Ext.P13, Annexure R1(a), Annexure A1 - The court discussed the Special Rules governing qualifications and method of appointment to the posts in the Archaeology Department, the illegal promotions and declarations of probation, and the need for review of promotions made in violation of the Special Rules. The court found that the appointments, declaration of probation, and promotions made in the Archaeology Department were plainly illegal and unauthorized. The court directed the Government to proceed with the review of the promotions and treat the promotions as provisional until the review is completed and consequential orders are passed.

Fact of the Case:

The first respondent joined the Archaeology Department as Museum Assistant and was provisionally promoted to Field Assistant (Malabar Survey) and later as Curator. The appellant was provisionally promoted to Research Assistant (Numismatics) and later as Technical Assistant. The promotions were made in violation of the Special Rules.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the promotions, declarations of probation, and appointments made in the Archaeology Department were illegal and unauthorized. The court directed the Government to proceed with the review of the promotions and treat the promotions as provisional until the review is completed and consequential orders are passed.

Issues: The issues involved the legality of the promotions, declarations of probation, and appointments made in the Archaeology Department in violation of the Special Rules.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the appointments, declaration of probation, and promotions made in the Archaeology Department were plainly illegal and unauthorized. The court directed the Government to proceed with the review of the promotions and treat the promotions as provisional until the review is completed and consequential orders are passed.

Final Decision: The Writ Appeal was disposed of with the direction for the Government to proceed with the review of the promotions and treat the promotions as provisional until the review is completed and consequential orders are passed.

Judgment :-

C.R.

Balakrishnan Nair, J.

The 4th respondent in the writ petition is the appellant. The writ petitioner is the first respondent herein.

2. The brief facts of the case are the following:

The first respondent joined the Archaeology Department, as Museum Assistant, on 28.11.1986. In due course, her probation was declared. The Special Rules(Recruitment Rules) governing qualifications and method of appointment to the posts in the said Department, both in the State Service and the Subordinate Service, were issued by the Government on 3.1.2000, as per G.O.(P) No.3/2000/CAD and G.O.(P) No.2/2000/CAD, respectively. (State service covers gazetted posts and Subordinate service covers non-gazetted posts in the department) As per the Special Rules, the post of Museum Assistant is a feeder category for promotion to the post of Manager, which is category No.8 in the Special Rules for the Kerala Archaeological Subordinate Service. The next higher posts are Research Assistant (Folklore) and Research Assistant (Numismatics). The method of appointment to these posts is by direct recruitment. Category No.2, Field Assistant(Malabar Survey) is the promotion post of Manager. The post of Field Assistant (Malabar Survey) is a feeder category for appointment by transfer to the posts of Epigraphy Assistant/Excavation Assistant/Curator. While those rules were enforced, the promotions in the department were reviewed. After the issuance of the Special Rules in 1974, several new posts were created in the department. Pending issuance of Special Rules covering them, they were being filled up on temporary/provisional/ad-hoc basis. When the new Special Rules were issued on 3.1.2000, covering them also, it became necessary that the appointments made to those posts have to be reviewed.

3. Purportedly, as part of the review, by Ext.P9, the first respondent/writ petitioner, who was working as Museum Assistant, was promoted provisionally as Field Assistant (Malabar Survey). But, the method of appointment to that post, as per the Special Rules, is by promotion from the post of Manager. One of the obligatory qualifications for promotion to the post of Field Assistant (Malabar Survey), is three years' experience in the post of Manager. In Ext.P9, it is stated by the Director that since the first respondent has been found eligible for promotion as Manager with retrospective effect, she has been provisionally promoted as Field Assistant (Malabar Survey). A translation of the relevant portion of the said order reads as follows :

"In the light of the judgment of the Honourable High Court referred as first paper and the directions issued by the Government as per letter referred as third paper, the promotions made in the Department of Archeology to non-gazetted technical posts have to be reviewed. As part of the third stage of the review proceedings being undertaken by a review committee constituted as per the directions of the Director referred as 6th paper, it was found that Smt.K.R.Sona, who is working as Museum Assistant (Higher Grade) in Thrissur Archaeological Museum, is eligible for promotion to the post of Manager, in the scale of pay of Rs.5000-8150 with retrospective effect; therefore, she is found eligible for promotion to the next higher post.

In the circumstances, Smt.K.R.Sona, who is working as Museum Assistant in Thrissur Archaeological Museum is provisionally appointed to the post of Field Assistant (Malabar Survey), which was shifted to Kozhikode Pazhassiraja Museum and which is becoming vacant, as per order referred as 7th paper above."

The judgment of this Court mentioned in the above order only directs review of provisional promotions made earlier, in the light of the new Special Rules issued. As evident from the above quoted order, the first respondent, working as a Museum Assistant, was directly promoted as Field Assistant (Malabar Survey) by-passing the intermediate post of Manager. Later, her probation was declared in the post of Field Ass


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top