SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Ker) 142

P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
Muhammad Rafeeq – Appellant
Versus
Bank Of Baroda – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:For the Petitioner:B.Krishnan, R. Parthasarathy, Advocates. For the Respondent:Devan Ramachandran, Advocate.

Judgment :

1. Whether the petitioners, who are strangers to the loan given by the first respondent Bank to the borrower, from whom the petitioners purchased one of the items of the properties over which security interest was created, is eligible to have the said property spared, placing reliance on Sec. 56 of the Transfer of property Act, is the point mooted in this Writ Petition.

2. The petitioners purchased the property covered by Ext. P1 sale deed from one Mustaffa, who had borrowed some amount from the first respondent, creating security interest over two items of properties. When the borrower turned to be a defaulter, the Bank declared the Account as 'NPA' and proceeded with further steps invoking the machinery under the SARFAESI Act, which led to issuance of Ext.P3 sale proclamation. The learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that, since the defaulter/borrower has already conveyed the first item of the properties, though after creating security interest over both the items of the properties, the rights and liberties of the petitioners, being the subsequent purchasers, so as to have the item 'marshalled' as contemplated under Section 56 of the Transfer of Property Act, ca

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top