High Court of Kerala
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C. HARI RANI
M. Krishna Preetha
Versus
Dr. Jayan Moorkkanatt & Another
Mat.Appeal.No.633 of 2008(A)
Decided on : 22-02-2010
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Section 13B - Divorce Act, 1869 - Section 10A - Special Marriage Act, 1954 - Section 28 - Can the waiting period after filing the joint petition for divorce under S.13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, S.10A of the Indian Divorce Act and S.28 of the Special Marriage Act be waived by the court suo motu or on the application of both parties - Held, Even if Court reckon the joint application under S.13B to have been properly instituted, Court have unmistakable indications to show that appellant had withdrawn her consent - She having come to this Court with this appeal disputing her consent Court have unassailable indications to show that within the period of six months she had contemplated and had taken a decision against divorce by mutual consent under S.13B - Court must further note that there is no specific application by the parties to dispense with the period of waiting under S.13B(2) - View Court have already taken is that even if there be such an application to dispense with the period of waiting, the court has no jurisdiction to waive/dispense with the said period - Conclusion is inevitable in these circumstances that the impugned order passed under S.13B of the Hindu Marriage Act is not valid, correct or proper - Impugned order passed under S.13B of the Hindu Marriage Act dissolving the marriage between the appellant and the 1st respondent by mutual consent is set aside - Appeal Allowed.
Basant,J.
Can the waiting period after filing the joint petition for divorce under Sec.13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, Sec.10A of the Indian Divorce Act and Sec.28 of the Special Marriage Act be waived by the court suo motu or on the application of both parties?
2. This question arose for consideration in various petitions and we posted all such cases together for hearing. Sri. G. Shrikumar, Advocate, has rendered assistance as amicus curiae for the court. We have had the advantage of hearing Advocates M/s S. Subash Chand, , Sandhya Raju, M.R. Rajesh, R. Sunilkumar, Shoby K. Francis and others on the question. We are answering that question in this case. The finding on that question in this case will be followed in all other cases.
3. Sec.13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, Sec.10A of the Divorce Act and Sec.28 of the Special Marriage Act are all identically worded except in so far as it relates to the stipulation of a larger period of separate residence under Sec.10A of the Divorce Act. That distinction is of no consequence in so far as the question to be considered in this case, raised above, is concerned.
4. The concept of marriage being solemn, sacrosanct and indissoluble is deeply rooted in the Hindu and Christian thoughts and way of life. The concept of divorce was itself accepted and recognized in these systems of personal laws after a long period which witnessed slow evolution of the law. Divorces on the ground of contumacious fault of the spouses and on the ground of absence of unavoidable requirements/essentials for a healthy married life were recognized by law initially. But the voluntary dissolution of marriage at the option of the spouses was not accepted as a concept for a long period of time in many systems of personal laws. With the progressive development of the society and in its march towards modernism, marriage was looked upon more as a social institution entered into by the spouses voluntarily as an incident of the right to life and pursuit of happiness. The institution of marriage started to be reckoned and perceived as one of complementarity partnership, friendship, association, love, affection, caring and sharing etc. With that, the concept of marriage as an institution made in heaven over which spouses have no control started waning. With that came the further thought and idea of terminating the relationship of marriage by the spouses voluntarily by mutual consent. Many a battle had to be fought to get the altered concepts accepted by the society. The change/transformation of mind set was not ushered in one fine morning or with ease. At long last we find individuals, community, society at large, public opinion and legislators yielding to such a concept of marriage and its dissolution and slowly accepting the idea of divorce by mutual consent. Secular personal law as also the different personal laws were constrained to swim with the times and accept the concept of divorce by mutual consent on joint application of the spouses.
5. We shall extract the provisions of Sec.13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, Sec.10A of the Divorce Act and Sec.28 of the Special Marriage Act for easy reference. They read as follows:
"13.B of the Hindu Marriage Act. Divorce by mutual consent.--(1) Subject to the provisions of this Act a petition for dissolution of marriage by a decree of divorce may be presented to the district court by both the parties to a marriage together, whether such marriage was solemnized before or after the commencement of the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, 1976 (68 of 1976), on the ground that they have been living separately for a period of one year or more, that they have not been able to live together and that they have mutually agreed that the marriage should be dissolved.
.(2) On the motion of both the parties made not earlier than six months after the date of the presentation of the petition referred to in sub-section (1) and not later than eighteen months after the said date, if the petition i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.