R.BASANT, M.C.HARI RANI
Kalesh – Appellant
Versus
Sudheer – Respondent
R. Basant, J.
Heard the learned counsel for the appellant. The appeal is admitted. Issue notice to the respondents. Call for the records. Put up after service is complete and records are received, for hearing and disposal in the usual course.
2. While admitting this appeal, after going through the impugned award, we feel compellingly persuaded to make certain general observations and issue directions.
3. Our experience in this jurisdiction reveals that the Tribunals, before concluding the awards, do not summarise the heads of claim, amounts claimed under each head, amounts awarded and the basis. This leads to the Tribunals committing the indiscretion of omitting to consider claims raised under certain heads as also claims, which though not specifically raised, do arise for consideration. Such omissions can be avoided effectively if Tribunals follow the thumb rule of summarizing the claims staked and the claims awarded in a tabular form at the end of the award.
4. We do also often come across cases where additions are not made properly and errors are committed in working out the total amount. All these, we are satisfied, can be effectively eliminated by Tribunals following
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.