ANTONY DOMINIC
K. P. Renadevan – Appellant
Versus
Ezhupunna Grama Panchayat – Respondent
1. Since 1985, petitioner has been conducting a piggery in his property with licence from the Panchayat, NOC of the District Medical Officer and consent issued by the Pollution Control Board. According to the petitioner, in 2007, when the licence became due for renewal, for reasons which are only political, at the instance of respondents 6 to 8, it was renewed by Ext.P1 order with a condition that the consent of the Pollution Control Board for the period subsequent to 1.7.2009 should be produced. The period of the licence thus renewed was upto 31.3.2010.
2. According to the petitioner, again at the instance of respondents 6 to 8, by Ext.P2, the Environmental Engineer of the Pollution Control Board refused to grant consent to operate the farm on the allegation that the petitioner had not provided satisfactory facilities for treatment of polluted effluents and was causing nuisance to the public by way of sound pollution.
3. Aggrieved by Ext.P2 order of the Environmental Engineer, petitioner filed Ext.P3 appeal before the Appellate Authority and the appeal is still pending consideration. While so, Ext.P4 notice dated 26.8.2009 was issued by the Panchayat, calling upon the pe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.