SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Ker) 215

K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, P.N.RAVINDRAN
State Of Kerala – Appellant
Versus
Komalam – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:Government Pleader. For the Respondent: --

Judgment :-

Balakrishnan Nair, J.

W.A.No.513/2010:

1. The point that arises for decision in this appeal is, on stay of prosecution of a criminal case registered against an abkari contractor under Section 57(a) of the Kerala Abkari Act (hereinafter referred to as"the Act"), whether it can be taken that no abkari case is registered against him for the purpose of sub-rule (1)(a) of Rule 5 of the Kerala Abkari Shops Disposal Rules, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as "the Rules"). The respondents in the Writ Petition are the appellants.

2. The brief facts of the case are the following: The respondent is the licensee of the toddy shops in Group I of Thiruvananthapuram Excise Range. Samples of toddy taken from T.S.No.1 under the said Range on 3.5.2007 was found to contain 8.83% volume by volume of ethyl alcohol. The sale of toddy containing that much volume of ethyl alcohol was a violation of Rule 9(2) of the Rules. The said conduct of the licensee disclosed offences under Sections 57(a) and 56(b) of the Act and so, Crime No.34/2007 was registered against the respondent for the said offences. The respondent challenged the rules concerning the strength of permissible ethyl alcohol in coconut

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top