SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Ker) 177

P.N.RAVINDRAN, K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR
State Of Kerala – Appellant
Versus
P. A. Radhakrishnan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:Advocate General. For the Respondent:George Poonthottam, Advocate.

Judgment :-

Balakrishnan Nair, J.

1. The appellants were the respondents in the Writ Petition. The respondents were the writ petitioners.

2. The brief facts of the case are the following : The respondents are the partners of Apsara Tourist Home. The said firm was having an FL-3 licence, authorising retail sale of Indian Made Foreign Liquor in its restaurant. There were 12 partners for the said firm, when it was reconstituted as per Ext.P2, on 1.4.1996. One of them, K.V.Balakrishnan, died on 13.6.2003. After his death, it was decided to reconstitute the partnership, with the remaining 11 partners. The son of K.V.Balakrishnan was already a partner of the firm. Annexure R-II dated 27.6.2003 was the partnership deed executed, pursuant to the said decision. It was forwarded to the Excise Commissioner, by Annexure R-III. But, the same was not approved by the said officer. The licence of the firm was being renewed from time to time.

3. Another partner, A.P.Antony, died on 9.10.1006. All his sons were already the partners of the firm. On his death, again, motion was made for reconstitution of the partnership, as per Ext.P1 dated 19.10.2006. At the time of death of A.P.Antony, he was an Ab






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top