High Court of Kerala
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMKUMAR
Sri. K.C. Joseph & Others
Versus
State Of Kerala & Others
Crl.MC.No. 1866 of 2010
Decided on : 31-05-2010
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Sections 173(5) & 161 - Petitioners who are accused for offences punishable under Ss.323,324,341 and 506(ii) read with 34 I.P.C. seek to quash order as per which the learned Magistrate refused the petitioner's request to supply copies of the 161 statements of CWs.2 and 3 recorded by the earlier investigating officer namely Sub Inspector of Police - Magistrate was of the view that only copies of those statements which are relied on by the prosecution need be supplied to the accused - Held, statements recorded under S.161 Cr.P.C of all the persons whom the prosecution proposes to examine as its witnesses should be produced in the Court and copies supplied to the accused - No case for the prosecution that charge witnesses 2 and 3 are not going to be examined on the side of the prosecution - If those witnesses are proposed to be examined by the prosecution, then their statements recorded under S.161 Cr.P.C by all the Investigating Officers should be produced before the Court and copies supplied to the accused in compliance of S.207 Cr. P.C - Order is set aside and application will stand allowed - Crl. M.C. Disposed of
"CR"
Petitioners who are accused Nos.1 to 3 in Crime No.139/2006 of Pulinkunnu Police Station and now pending before the J.F.C.M, Ramankary as C.C.No.181/2009 for offences punishable under Section 323,324,341 and 506(ii) read with 34 IPC seek to quash Annexure A7 order dated 22.3.2010 as per which the learned Magistrate refused the petitioner's request under Annexure A6 to supply copies of the 161 statements of CWs.2 and 3 recorded by the earlier investigating officer namely Sub Inspector of Police, Ramankary. The learned Magistrate was of the view that only copies of those statements which are relied on by the prosecution need be supplied to the accused.
2. The above view taken by the Magistrate with regard to statements under Section 161 Cr.P.C is clearly opposed to Section 173(5)(b) Cr.P.C. While in the case of documents, only those documents which the prosecution proposes to rely on, need be produced and copies supplied to the accused, the position is different in the case of statements of witnesses. Sub-section(5) of Section 173 Cr.P.C reads as follows:-
"5) When such report is in respect of a case to which Section 170 applies, the police officer shall forward to the Magistrate along with the report-
a) all documents or relevant extracts thereof on which the prosecution proposes to rely other than those already sent to the Magistrate during investigation;
b) the statements recorded under Section 161 of all the persons whom the prosecution proposes to examine as its witnesses."
Thus, the statements recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C of all the persons whom the prosecution proposes to examine as its witnesses should be produced in the Court and copies supplied to the accused. There is no case for the prosecution that charge witnesses 2 and 3 are not going to the examined on the side of the prosecution. If those witnesses are proposed to be examined by the prosecution, then their statements recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C by all the Investigating Officers should be produced before the Court and copies supplied to the accused in compliance of Section 207 Cr.P.C. Accordingly, Annexure 7 order is set aside and Annexure 6 application will stand allowed.
This Crl.M.C is disposed of as above. Dated this the 31st day of May, 2010.
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.