SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Ker) 543

V.K.MOHANAN
V. Vijayakumar – Appellant
Versus
M. T. Vijayan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:R. Sudhish, Advocate. For the Respondents: Public Prosecutor.

Judgment :-

“(C.R)”

1. The challenge in this Crl. Revision Petition is against the conviction and sentence imposed against the revision petitioner, who is the accused in a prosecution for the offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (for short, the N.I.Act).

2. The case of the complainant, the first respondent herein, is that the complainant and the accused are close family friends and out of that relationship, the revision petitioner/accused borrowed a sum of Rs.2,50,000/- from the complainant on 5.12.2003 and on receipt of the said amount, towards the discharge of the said liability, the accused issued a cheque dated 5.12.2003. According to the complainant, when the above said cheque was presented for encashment, the same was dishonoured for the following reasons: (1) Drawer's signature incomplete, (2) payment stopped by the drawer and (3) funds insufficient. On receipt of the dishonour memo, the complainant caused to issue a lawyer notice informing the accused regarding the dishonour of the cheque and also demanding for the payment of the amount covered by the dishonoured cheque and in spite of receipt of the notice, no amount is paid by the accused


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top