High Court of Kerala
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. MOHANAN
Suo Motu
Versus
State Of Kerala, Represented by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala, Ernakulam
Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 3079 of 2010
Decided on : 01-11-2010
Criminal Procedure Code,1973 -Section.408 - Approached to Sessions Court, with prayer to transfer Crime pending in the Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate-Alathur, the case in which he is the de facto complainant, for simultaneous trial along with S.C.No.493/09 - Above two cases are related to the same incident and at the same time and place, in the same transaction. - Petition for transfer was not opposed by anybody. According to the learned Sessions Judge, the two cases, being case and counter, must be simultaneously tried and disposed by the same Judge and since one case is pending in the Sessions Court, the other case pending before the Court of Magistrate, is liable to be transferred to the Addl. Sessions Court in exercising the powers u/S.408 of Cr.P.C- Sessions Judge allowed the petition directing the Judicial First Class Magistrate-Alathur to transfer C.C.No.258/08 pending there, to the Court of Addl. Sessions Judge (Adhoc)-I, Palakkad, for simultaneous trial with S.C.No.493/09. Consequently, it is directed that the learned Magistrate shall transmit the records to the Court of learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Palakkad -Held, Division Bench decision, it is crystal clear that all the powers enjoined by the High Court u/S.407 are not given to Sessions Court u/S.408 of Cr.P.C. In 'Abdul Salam's case, the Division Bench has specifically found that S.407(1)(iii) gives power to the High Court to direct the Magistrate to commit the case for trial to the Sessions division for simultaneous trial with another sessions case pending in that Sessions division - Caption of Ss.407 and 408 of Cr.P.C. are though similarly worded with respect to the powers of the High Court as well as of the Sessions Court, the power of High Court to transfer a case or appeal is wider than the powers of the Sessions Court. On a close reading of the above sections, it can be seen that, the power of a Sessions Court to transfer a case or an appeal is limited to cases or appeals which are properly instituted. So, by virtue of S.408 of Cr.P.C., transfer of any appeal or case properly instituted and pending before any subordinate court to that Sessions court, can be transfered to another subordinate Criminal Court which has same jurisdiction. But regarding the powers of High Court to transfer the case or appeal, especially in the light of sub-cls. (i) to (iv) series, sub-s.(1) of S.407, it can be seen that even the cases covered by those clauses can also be amenable to the jurisdiction of the High Court for transfer -But as far as Sessions Courts are concerned, no such powers are given while exercising the jurisdiction to transfer a case or appeal - order dated 19.6.2010 in Crl.M.P.1264/10 of the Court of Sessions, Palakkad Division, is illegal and irregular and S.408 of Cr.P.C. -Petition is disposed
This suo motu revision is registered on the basis of the letter dated 20.7.2010 of the Palakkad District Court, addressing the Registrar (Subordinate Judiciary), High Court of Kerala. The short facts which lead to the registration of the above revision petition is as follows :-
2. One Parameswaran, S/o.Krishnan, Pothuvar House, Vithinassery, Nemmara, Palakkad District, who is an accused in S.C.No.493/09, approached the Sessions Court, Palakkad Division by filing Crl.M.P.No.1264/10 with a prayer to transfer C.C.No.258/08 pending in the Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate-Alathur, the case in which he is the defacto complainant, for simultaneous trial along with S.C.No.493/09. According to the revision petitioner therein, the above two cases are related to the same incident and at the same time and place, in the same transaction.
3. On the filing of the above petition, the Sessions Court obtained a report from the police through the Public Prosecutor in which it is stated that C.C.No.258/08 pending before the Judicial First Class Magistrate-Alathur, is counter to S.C.No.493/09, pending before the Addl. Sessions Court (Ad hoc)-I, Palakkad. The said petition for transfer was not opposed by anybody. According to the learned Sessions Judge, the two cases, being case and counter, must be simultaneously tried and disposed by the same judge and since one case is pending in the Sessions Court, the other case pending before the Court of Magistrate, is liable to be transferred to the Addl. Sessions Court in exercising the powers u/s.408 of Cr.P.C. Accordingly, the learned Sessions Judge allowed the petition directing the Judicial First Class Magistrate-Alathur to transfer C.C.No.258/08 pending there, to the Court of Addl. Sessions Judge (Adhoc)-I, Palakkad, for simultaneous trial with S.C.No.493/09. Consequently, it is directed that the learned Magistrate shall transmit the records to the Court of learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Palakkad.
4. In pursuance of the above order of the learned Sessions Judge, the learned Magistrate issued two orders on 1.7.2010 in C.C.No.258/08. First order is as follows :
" Heard accused, reported counsel that Crl.M.P.1264/2010 dated 19.6.2010 of Honourable Sessions Judge, Palakkad, case transferred to Addl. Sessions Court, Palakkad. Hence send records to Honourable Addl. Sessions Court No.I, Palakkad."
The other order on the same day is as follows :-
" Converted as C.P.No.51/10. The case is transmitted to the Honourable Addl. Sessions Court (Fast Track Court) No.I, Palakkad, vide order in Crl.M.P.No.1264/2010 dated 19.6.2010 of Honourable Sessions Judge at Palakkad. Hence case committed to Honourable Addl. Sessions Court (Fast Track No.I) as directed."
5. Thus, against the above order of the learned Sessions Judge and the proceedings of the learned Magistrate, the Addl. District & Sessions Judge (Ad hoc-I), Palakkad, addressed the Registry of this court stating that, the learned Magistrate has simply converted the case into a committal proceedings and numbered as C.P.No.51/10 and transmitted the case to the Addl. Sessions Court, without the order of committal of this case to the Sessions Court, Palakkad, and thus it is a grave legal infirmity. Thus relying upon the decision of this court reported in State of Kerala Vs. Annamma & Ors. {2003
(1) KLJ 880 (2003 (2) KLT 763)}, the learned Addl. District & Sessions Judge filed a report, stating that the matter may be submitted before the High Court for reference and to set aside the order passed by the learned Sessions Judge-Palakkad, u/s.408 of Cr.P.C., in transferring C.C.No.258/08 (C.P.No.51/10) from the Judicial First Class Magistrate-Alathur to the Addl. Sessions Court (Ad hoc)-I, Palakkad.
6. While forwarding the above report of the Addl. District & Sessions Judge (Ad hoc)-I, Palakkad, the District Judge, Palakkad, in his letter dated 20.7.2010 recorded his remark that, he issued the transfer order on the following grounds that,
" Fast Track Court
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.