SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Ker) 731

High Court of Kerala
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. RAY & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N. RAVINDRAN
The District Collector, Civil Station & Others
Versus
V.K. Sreekumari Kunjamm
WA.No. 1262 of 2009
Decided on : 21-12-2010

Advocates Appeared:For the Petitioners:K. Vinod Chandran, Special Government Pleader. For the Respondent:P.M. Mohammed Shiraz, Advocate.

Headnote:

Kerala Building Tax Act, 1975 -Section. 2(e) and 2(k) - Whether a building with two residential apartments owned by the same person should be assessed as a single building in his name as the owner or should be assessed as two buildings treating each residential apartment as a separate building in the name of the same owner. Considering the importance of the issue and the divergent opinions expressed by different Benches of this Court, the Division Bench referred the matter for decision by Full Bench - Held, sale of flats by a builder after completion of construction of apartment building to different owners will not justify separate assessment of each flat under Explanation (2) to S.2(e) of the Act. Judgment is that unless apartment building is constructed by the joint owners by sharing the cost, each and every apartment cannot be assessed as a separate building, no matter the building after construction was sold by the owner to different persons. In this case different ownership for the building happens after completion of construction of the building and, the sale made thereafter to different owners is immaterial for the purpose of assessment. In fact, the incidence of tax is on completion of construction of the building and it is immaterial as to whether the owner retains the building or transfers the same in full or in part or in pieces after completion of construction - Appeal by vacating the judgment of the learned Single Judge and by restoring the single assessment of the building comprising of two residential units.

Judgment :-

Ramachandran Nair, J. The specific question referred to the Full Bench by a Division Bench of this court is whether a building with two residential apartments owned by the same person should be assessed as a single building in his name as the owner or should be assessed as two buildings treating each residential apartment as a separate building in the name of the same owner. Considering the importance of the issue and the divergent opinions expressed by different Benches of this court, the Division Bench referred the matter for decision by Full Bench. We have heard Government Pleader appearing for the appellant and counsel appearing for the respondent.

2. The learned Single Judge referred to a Single Bench judgment of this court in LALITHA VS. STATE OF KERALA reported in 1994 (2) KLT 66 and held that since there is no provision for clubbing plinth areas of different buildings under common ownership for the assessment of building tax, the building involved which is a single building with two residential apartments, cannot be assessed as one building. The question has to be considered with reference to the relevant provisions in the Kerala Building Tax Act, 1975 (hereinafter called "the Act") which are extracted hereunder: S.2. Definitions:- (e) "building" means a house, out-house, garage, or any other structure, or part thereof, whether of masonry, bricks, wood, metal or other material, but does not include any portable shelter or any shed constructed principally of mud, bamboos, leaves, grass or thatch or a latrine which is not attached to the main structure. Explanation 1:- In the case of buildings constructed for providing housing accommodation for workers and their families residing in plantations, in pursuance of Section 15 of the Plantations Labour Act, 1951 (Central Act 69 of 1951) or buildings constructed under the Government of India Subsidised Housing Scheme for industrial workers, each part of a building providing or intended to provide accommodation for a worker or a worker and his family shall be deemed to be a separate building. Explanation 2:- Where a building consists of different apartments or flats owned by different persons and the cost of construction of the building was met by all such persons jointly, each such apartment or flat shall be deemed to be a separate building. (k) "plinth area" means the area included in the floor of a building and where a building has more than one floor the aggregate area included in all the floors together: Provided that in the case of a building referred to in the Explanation 2 to clause (e), the plinth area shall be calculated separately. S.5. Charge of building tax:- (1) Subject to the other provisions contained in this Act, there shall be charged a tax (hereinafter referred to as "building tax") based on the plinth area at the rate specified in the Schedule on every building the construction of which is completed on or after the appointed day. S.7. Return of completion, etc., of building:-(1) The owner of every building the construction of which is completed, or to which major repair or improvement is made on or after the appointed day shall furnish to the assessing authority a return in the prescribed form within the prescribed period along with a copy of the plan approved by the local authority or such other authorities as may be specified by the Government in this behalf and verified in the prescribed manner and containing such particulars as may be prescribed. S.9. Assessment:- (1) If the assessing authority is satisfied that a return made by an owner under Section 7 or Section 8 is correct and complete, it shall assess the amount payable by him as building tax or luxury tax on the basis of the return." What is clear from the above provisions is that the subject matter of assessment is the building and the person to be assessed is the owner and the basis of assessment is the plinth area of the building. The charging section makes it clear that the charge of






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top