SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Ker) 725

THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, P.BHAVADASAN
P. Maya Siva Sankar – Appellant
Versus
Sathi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:For the Petitioner:T.K. Venugopalan, Advocate. For The Respondent:M. Ravikumar, Advocate.

Judgment :-

"C.R."

Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J.

1. Ambujakshy Amma and Madhava Menon had only one son, Jayaraja Menon @ Rajan Menon. The plaintiffs are his daughters through Sarasija @ Omanakunjamma. The parents of the plaintiffs were granted divorce as per Ext.B6 order dated 18.12.1981 by the competent court on an application under Section 13 B of the Hindu Marriage Act, after fairly long drawn contentious proceedings for divorce even before this Court. Thereafter, Rajan Menon married the first defendant on 16.6.1982 (Ext.B5 is the marriage certificate). He, thereafter, died on 17.1.1983. The second defendant was born to the first defendant and Rajan Menon. There is no dispute on this.

2. In 1993, that is, more than 10 years after the demise of Rajan Menon, the plaintiffs sued for partition of what they described as the estate left behind by Rajan Menon.

3. In answer, the defendants contended that Rajan Menon had executed Exts.B3 and B4 in favour of the plaintiffs on 23.4.1981, and it was on that consensus, that the mother of the plaintiffs agreed for the divorce and Exts.B3 and B4 were executed essentially in terms of that family settlement, as a result of which, the plaintif












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top