SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Ker) 709

P.N.RAVINDRAN
Muraleedharan. C. – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent


Advocates Appeaed:For the Petitioner:P. Samsudin, Advocate. For the Respondents: M. Manu, Government Pleader.

Judgment :-

1. Ext.P7 order passed by the Commissioner of Excise cancelling the licences issued to the petitioner to run toddy shop Nos.1 to 5 , 12 and 13 in Group No.1 of Kalpetta Excise Range is under challenge in this writ petition. Ext.P7 order was passed pursuant to a report of analysis which disclosed that toddy which was seized from shop No.2 of Group No.1 of Kalpetta Excise Range contained starch thereby violating rule 9(2) of the Kerala Abkari Shops Disposal Rules, 2002. The petitioner contends relying on the decision of a learned single Judge of this Court in Balu v. State of Kerala, 2007(1) KLT 401 that addition of starch to toddy does not attract sections 56 and 57(a) of the Kerala Abkari Act for the reason that addition of starch does not add to the actual or apparent intoxicating quality or strength of toddy. Referring to the decision of the Apex Court in State of Kerala v. Unni, 2007 (1) KLT 151 (SC) it is contended that though rule 9(2) of the Kerala Abkari Shops Disposal Rules, 2002 was declared ultravires by the Apex Court and rule 9(2) was later amended, no material change has been brought about to the rule and therefore the petitioner is not liable to be proceede










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top