SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Ker) 32

High Court of Kerala
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
Binesh. G. Vadath
Versus
The District Collector & Others
WP(C).No. 9933 of 2009(J) & 10598 of 2009
Decided on : 10-01-2011

Advocates Appeared:For the Petitioner:Saji Kuriachan, T.V. George, M.R. Nandakumar, Advocates. For the Respondents:Dileep Mohan, Government Pleader, Murali Purushothaman, Advocates.

The main legal point established in the judgment is that the authorities should be guided by the circular issued by the Election Commission in regulating the deposit of licensed arms during elections.

Headnote:

Arms Act - Deposit of Licensed Arms - Section 3.10, 3.11, 3.12, 3.13 - The court considered the provisions of the Arms Act and the circular issued by the Election Commission regulating the deposit of licensed arms during elections. The judgment laid down guidelines for ordering the deposit of licensed arms and directed the authorities to be guided by the circular issued by the Election Commission.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners were directed to deposit their licensed weapons during the Lok Sabha Election 2009. They approached the court seeking the return of their weapons, contending that there is no provision in the Arms Act enabling the authorities to require deposit of licensed weapons during the subsistence of the license.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the deposit of licensed arms was ordered in connection with the Lok Sabha Election 2009 and that the Election Commission had issued a circular regulating the deposit of licensed arms. The court directed the authorities to be guided by the circular and disposed of the writ petitions.

Issues: The main issue was whether the authorities had the power to require the deposit of licensed arms during the subsistence of the license, especially in connection with elections.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the provisions of the Arms Act and the circular issued by the Election Commission, and held that the authorities should be guided by the circular in regulating the deposit of licensed arms during elections.

Final Decision: The court directed that henceforth, the deposit of licensed arms shall be as per the circular issued by the Election Commission.

Judgment :

1. Petitioner in W.P.(C) No.9933/2009 was granted licence to hold one 12 bore SBBL Gun No.P 8437 and revolver No.0651 00080. The petitioner in W.P.(C) No.10598/2009 has been granted licence to hold one 12 bore SBBL Gun No.M/4 - 4635 and one SBML Gun No.5071. Petitioners state that the licences have been renewed periodically and are still valid.

2. They approached this Court complaining that during the second week of March, 2009, the Sub Inspector of Police, within whose jurisdiction they reside, directed them to deposit their weapons in the police station and accordingly, they deposited the weapons. In these writ petitions, the contention raised is that there is no provision either in the Arms Act or Rules, enabling the third respondent or the licencing authority to require deposit of the licenced weapons either as a temporary or permanent measure, during the subsistence of the licence issued. It is on this basis, prayer is sought, requiring the respondents to return the weapons deposited by them.

3. Although the petitioners were directed to deposit the weapons on account of the Election to the Parliament which was announced on 02-03-2009 and the weapons deposited were returned to them, the writ petitions were retained and considered on account of the fact that the grievance raised is of a recurring nature.

4. In the statement filed on behalf of respondents 2 and 3, contention raised is that in connection with the Lok Sabha Election 2009, the Directer General of Police, vide message dated 12-03-2009, directed the subordinates to ensure deposit of licenced arms within the police station limits. It is stated that it was in pursuance to the said instruction that the third respondent directed the licence holders to deposit the licenced arms. According to them, for conducting a free and fair election, it was necessary to order deposit of licenced arms.

5. In this writ petition, the Election Commission, which was impleaded as additional 6th respondent, has filed a statement, producing Annexures-A and B. Annexure-A is a judgment of the Bombay High Court rendered in identical circumstances and which laid down guidelines for ordering deposit of licenced arms. It is stated that incorporating the guidelines issued by the Bombay High Court, the Commission has issued Annexure-B circular dated 01-09-2009 addressed to the Chief Secretaries of all States and the Chief Electoral Officers of all States. The Circular, in so far as deposit of licenced arms is concerned, reads as under:-

"Deposit of Licensed Arms

3.10 Immediately after the announcement of elections, District Magistrates shall make a detailed and individual review and assessment (in accordance with the prevalent State laws) of all licence holders so that licensed arms in those cases where they consider it essential are impounded in order to ensure maintenance of law and order so essential for ensuring free and fair elections. These arms should be deposited with the district authorities. Among cases which may need to be reviewed are the following:

(a) Arms licenses of persons released on bail,

(b) Arms licenses of persons having a history of criminal offences, and

(c) Arms licenses of personspreviously involved in rioting at any time but especially during the election period. The above categories are only illustrative and not exhaustive.

3.11 As per the above referred guidelines laid down by the Bombay High Court, for such review and assessment of all licence holders;

(a) There shall be a Screening Committee in every District and in every Commissionerate area. In the District, the Screening Committee shall consist of the District Magistrate and the Superintendent of Police. In the Commissionerate area, it shall consist of the Commissioner of Police (Admn.) and Joint/Additional Commissioner of Police(Admn.).

(b) The Screening Committee shall commence the work of screening from the day of announcement of election by the Election Commission and it shall complete the exer









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top