PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, N.K.BALAKRISHNAN
R. S. Biju – Appellant
Versus
Madhavikutty Amma – Respondent
Pius C. Kuriakose, J.
1. Under challenge in this revision filed under Section 20 by the tenant is the judgment of the Rent Control Appellate Authority confirming the summary order of eviction which was passed by the Rent Control Court under Section 12(3) of Act 2 of 1965. The above summary order was passed on 8/4/2010. In order to appreciate whether the above order is legal and proper, it will be necessary to read the order dated 11/3/2010 passed by the learned Rent Control Court in the application under Section 12 which was filed by the landlady. Copy of the above order is placed before us by Sri. G.Unnikrishnan. We are convinced on a reading of that order that the learned Rent Control Court has examined the question whether there is justification for proposing a summary order under Section 12(3) and also that show cause notice has been issued to the tenant as to why he should not be summarily evicted. The order dated 8/4/2010 is obviously passed by the Rent Control Court noticing that no satisfactory cause is shown by the tenant against the proposed summary order of eviction.
2. The learned Appellate Authority did not notice any infirmity in the order passed by the Re
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.